IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10> for your review

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 04 April 2024 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE9BC14CE40; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyvqSW0bJAAl; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24FF6C15154E; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 08:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5586764bd0aso280989a12.0; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712242853; x=1712847653; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Om8re2PUPpfpW3udLT9FrbuBsQ9ahmybBU79VbGHOCQ=; b=ag3c3kY/lI0Ed7rCeOeyVEzzUr84vypbijiRabqIs9cl7SNfGSEpwCX0jIpn55W9cc 0tIYR0p1XWjQKRwHbWCv6f2Iwz8ziYlsLRfb+UrUZSPcZ5pqlpMaPn5RHA7c19iHQpEl zmgJQel8hetvFSHjAD9hamMc1hhG3+WbA+uSsahTLm79tb5bMpMrJ1BAKOf6xRI+PA1Y sBZRwQUZVlWT0BeahUsaPonRjUBtwrDrbvbfvidy1mYqEqt1G4scOnVBloFDOA+bdGxM 8r4svJDyBplwRFHU+mYn+thbgyHsbjWgNr9WEBnu6uau6deB20vd3OsP9Qn2WeGpEqyW gMYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712242853; x=1712847653; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Om8re2PUPpfpW3udLT9FrbuBsQ9ahmybBU79VbGHOCQ=; b=dpbtJgocAOQB3AuV2uxA3R5wcSuq5fCGL3u8EbvPJC7rFSogqsgkLmACWL+gBoBNnM X+MEJzXl54TTt4zcCG7rAaZkOBKeGsppmwYrFneY4Y48rJPSKmqfKH6w+W99P0P1VIxm KsN6Q++cdh9pW7OkpqlwDzN+DMIwNrKdjIWBCZW98wj9xy6lmIDbGSeChVaU8BiFiMHb t2I1TUSKBFCkQCpL1GRBLlv1GEYKHxYuW6EhmHoEr8etuL5oTuIki4cvHkgSGc5H9ZMz 1RJIfXT8zBAnGt+NzYyRFU6+m4ODz0bdnlzm9MevAyDbwR++gJ+xzKF8j0H/HHCTf/to iYxA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXUOu02GyD7E13PnH9xhuTwjn/O2GHjIvzepabiognTdFkUkN5V2+5yLpWpepZu+gMC4jEUngWi7FoikbRUfZ52e0qFRZt+IqxGzdLODRyMfRC3UY5GtfCTU1emfgOu5fPDUKqzzL3a
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxrUaJW5u/VSc5TKi2mwMByE5W7wV7DNNdgOR6k4vvQyZOxhjd tJ/KkyLgODPseaPi+OzGCmpygteBkJglTYaP6Iad+kd5DvXRvmcWIFzq1UBYLD0ABbe1llfnntx 6r1PT8rc6AteaI6DpROBbpoN9HVg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHaWhi89C9WnljWMqMdxL+YLVykCPkJrEC7hbNXnSXhuJMg7W6Gg2ktVwWT32X9DApJ5ABKRTpYvTTOQSMGLmg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2982:b0:a51:93bb:89c9 with SMTP id eu2-20020a170907298200b00a5193bb89c9mr602790ejc.6.1712242852916; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240315214259.96B0D1FFA18E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <48b5c001-604f-4982-9ce4-c39936733b4b@app.fastmail.com> <2ffce6d6-b5f1-45f4-a9aa-8eb34963c954@app.fastmail.com> <1A81437D-D40C-4BF0-92B6-99C48B2AF357@amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZrt9it4u1=A=oJ6sYc3uOr2uhsEOykJOBETg7BCoi=+Q@mail.gmail.com> <de8698f9-e930-4792-8f5c-f3d82ccbda91@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <de8698f9-e930-4792-8f5c-f3d82ccbda91@app.fastmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:00:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZJz=DLQmdAxJ1z+s8V56qRPn3hG8TY0GMa368Fkp9-GQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com>, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>, rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, calext-ads@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000475b30615469b79"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/9r5WanwV85J0SVSydr5Haaza-TI>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9554 <draft-ietf-calext-vcard-jscontact-extensions-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:01:34 -0000

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:00 AM Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
wrote:

> Is there an explanation of these changes anywhere?  All I see in this
> thread is a whole new XML file from Robert.  Maybe I've missed something?
>
>
> You did not, I missed providing an explanation:
>
> Changing the LANG parameter to LANGUAGE:
> The section mistakenly had allowed the LANG parameter for the new
> properties, but LANG is the name of a vCard _property_. The correct name of
> the _parameter_ is LANGUAGE.
>
> Removing the ALTID parameter from GRAMGENDER:
> We removed the ALTID parameter because it isn't necessary. There can only
> be one grammatical gender per contact and language anyway.
>
> Updated examples:
> We updated the examples to clarify both the changes that I just outlined.
>
> Sorry for the confusion. I guess we'll owe you a couple of explanations
> for similar changes in RFC 9555, too.
>

I just noticed that Roman is the processing AD, helping Francesca, so I
don't know why I replied in the first place.  Either way...

Changes like this not initiated by the RFC Editor during AUTH48 make ADs
nervous.  It's not on the record that this change has WG consensus, even if
it appears to be obviously the right thing to do.  The bulletproof solution
here is to send it back to the WG to confirm, but I don't have a good
feeling for how significant these changes are.

Orie, this is your WG now.  What do you recommend?

-MSK, ART AD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email