Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9319 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen-15> for your review

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Wed, 28 September 2022 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21873C15E3FE for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yMUoWcgSwx8 for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A428C1522DB for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id b2so3972170eja.6 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date; bh=z4McTmFk934oEa9A8sM0dGWsiNRHCvgUlJCykkF5cOw=; b=A1CcWWmsPSkxWugHAebZgi991OwEpgldszIS2aH0zP0m8qaPT+kEf6sfZ6+WlD6/0U 1QL4HRWxRAzWFh/rzgzxBEt57Lg5Z51xyRkoJ5NAblrcbW0ILKGJSj0VLXXapHp9gesj 6KffyEmJ6Tda9wdDA29KAWs7sMwsuWBVUxw4k=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=z4McTmFk934oEa9A8sM0dGWsiNRHCvgUlJCykkF5cOw=; b=pP5JWMYUP7hMbGrS3aAGNBt9YWpfMCdA+iskOX5SOJw5VK+mm2jYYS3+UGx1qQTJEl zDWimpUKfMW7m0fzQvBZGkeNhY3PPnq+pFfLxeCjNT/+GKyhBY9/UiGx5CYgFhX+LlQw 9XTrTComJTm/8qpke2fIvrsbr2cRdqKNrlpH2Hy5UIVzovdaU7S0UtaCbMGPEJBRgs/r WpUfbaxU3vdcOsD5l5J9RLG3ENAA/arTSJ/0quOz/UJQsOm7w3PdyA/sVTh8lO8oJDJ+ B/JIwMUcc3pz1yY3/Qimg1vrJiICQZjqZo2r+MkUHw9ubZkIZYF4W3UTLIqR5uHEVzYN X6pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2Sn0qMfZNysY6K/CswmdVlPMYO55f6kqwt6Ssu+J/iMRSOmFBS m1mVXsmh3ChzDbqpIIhpwMdmkQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6h5XIERKFQxqClEo4j5F1SiXTgVip334th8d9RPE37T12h6qkhW/pexmxmMhgpVJbun69PIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:783:b0:76e:f290:8b5 with SMTP id xd3-20020a170907078300b0076ef29008b5mr28083562ejb.395.1664368929495; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snel ([2a10:3781:276:1:16f6:d8ff:fe47:2eb7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id by7-20020a170906a2c700b007708130c287sm2278172ejb.40.2022.09.28.05.42.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:42:07 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: yossigi@cs.huji.ac.il, goldbe@cs.bu.edu, kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov, benm@workonline.africa, sidrops-ads@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, warren@kumari.net, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <YzRBHyNOvG2x1pVX@snel>
References: <20220927053054.536874C956@rfcpa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20220927053054.536874C956@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/Q11sp1NXnUgh5y786PHK1TTIbs4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9319 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:42:15 -0000

Hi all,

I approve this RFC for publication.

Kind regards,

Job

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:30:54PM -0700, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2022/09/26
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> 
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and 
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.  
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies 
> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
> 
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties 
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing 
> your approval.
> 
> Planning your review 
> ---------------------
> 
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
> 
> *  RFC Editor questions
> 
>    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor 
>    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as 
>    follows:
> 
>    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> 
>    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors 
> 
>    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your 
>    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you 
>    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> 
> *  Content 
> 
>    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot 
>    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>    - contact information
>    - references
> 
> *  Copyright notices and legends
> 
>    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions 
>    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
> 
> *  Semantic markup
> 
>    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of  
>    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode> 
>    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at 
>    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
> 
> *  Formatted output
> 
>    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the 
>    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is 
>    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting 
>    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> 
> 
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
> 
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all 
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties 
> include:
> 
>    *  your coauthors
>    
>    *  rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team)
> 
>    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., 
>       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the 
>       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
>      
>    *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list 
>       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion 
>       list:
>      
>      *  More info:
>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
>      
>      *  The archive itself:
>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
> 
>      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out 
>         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you 
>         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, 
>         auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and 
>         its addition will be noted at the top of the message. 
> 
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> 
> An update to the provided XML file
>  — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
> 
> Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
> OLD:
> old text
> 
> NEW:
> new text
> 
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit 
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> 
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, 
> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in 
> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> 
> 
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
> 
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> 
> 
> Files 
> -----
> 
> The files are available here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.xml
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.pdf
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.txt
> 
> Diff file of the text:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-diff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> 
> For your convenience, we have also created an alt-diff file that will 
> allow you to more easily view changes where text has been deleted or 
> moved: 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-alt-diff.html
> 
> Diff of the XML: 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-xmldiff1.html
> 
> The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own 
> diff files of the XML.  
> 
> Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.original.v2v3.xml 
> 
> XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates 
> only: 
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.form.xml
> 
> 
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
> 
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9319
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.  
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9319 (draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen-15)
> 
> Title            : The Use of maxLength in the RPKI
> Author(s)        : Y. Gilad, S. Goldberg, K. Sriram, J. Snijders, B. Maddison
> WG Chair(s)      : Keyur Patel, Chris Morrow
> 
> Area Director(s) : Warren Kumari, Robert Wilton
> 
>