Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9319 <draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen-15> for

[Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sriram and Ben,

Ben, we have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9319).

We also made the update in the Introduction as suggested by Sriram. One further question: does ROV stand for "RPKI-based Route Origin Validation” or simply "Route Origin Validation”? We’d like to clarify so that this document will be consistent and so that we can accurately update our abbreviations list (the acronym ROV has not yet been used in the RFC Series). We see instances of both "RPKI-based ROV” and “ROV” in the document. Are any further updates needed for consistency? 

This should be our last question; thank you for your patience!

_______________

Updated XML file:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.xml

Updated output files:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.pdf
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319.html

Diff file showing all changes made during AUTH48:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-auth48diff.html

Diff files showing all changes:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-diff.html
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side diff)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9319-alt-diff.html (shows changes where text was moved/deleted)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9319

Thank you,

RFC Editor/rv



> On Sep 29, 2022, at 11:23 PM, Ben Maddison <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sriram, Rebecca,
> 
> On 09/30, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote:
>>> We have updated the document. We would like to check with you on one
>>> more thing. RFC 6811 is frequently cited for "RPKI-based Route Origin
>>> Validation (ROV)” and “ROV” in this document; however, RFC 6811
>>> doesn’t include the acronym ROV, though it does discuss “Origin
>>> Validation”. Will this cause any problems for readers?
>> 
> [..]
>> 
>> Just so we are on the same page: I have replaced RPKI-based ROV in the
>> first paragraph with ROV. The abstract includes 'RPKI-based Route
>> Origin Validation (ROV)' and the first use of ROV in the Introduction
>> is the paragraph cited above (Considerations....).
> 
> I have no problem with this change.
> 
> Subject to the above final edit, I approve for RFC publication.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben