IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [Cluster456] AUTH48 Questions: RFCs 9280 - 9283 (draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model, draft-rsalz-2028bis, draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026, draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter)

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Tue, 21 June 2022 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE4AC15AAF4; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFhcnZmbcJvi; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCBEC15AAF2; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1DC425A37D; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAIp7NyZoima; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:1586:9fb5:97c0:3a57] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:1586:9fb5:97c0:3a57]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7334E425A37C; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <48790A46-FB1A-4A06-B584-E81E8F0DCF37@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:12 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "iab@ietf.org" <iab@ietf.org>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9FED362D-C96C-4B70-8ED0-630C6F8789D0@amsl.com>
References: <20220618052657.5B652C88D8@rfcpa.amsl.com> <48790A46-FB1A-4A06-B584-E81E8F0DCF37@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "stpeter@stpeter.im" <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "br@brianrosen.net" <br@brianrosen.net>, "brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/Q3nrIh1m8lC8x11dansI4GQkSa4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [Cluster456] AUTH48 Questions: RFCs 9280 - 9283 (draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model, draft-rsalz-2028bis, draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026, draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter)
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 19:43:15 -0000

Hi Rich,

Thank you for your email. We did not make any changes relating to question #4 about "the Trust" vs "the IETF Trust” as you, Peter, and Brian concur that the text is clear.

Thanks!
RFC Editor/rv



> On Jun 21, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> As the author of RFC 9281 (nee 2028bis), I am fine with all of your suggested changes and concur with Peter and Brian.
> 
> I believe the only question is "the Trust" vs "the IETF Trust" in 9281. Since the Subject heading says "The IETF Trust" and the first paragraph also uses those terms, I think it's clear. If you think it should be made explicit, feel free.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email