IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Fri, 22 July 2022 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07006C13C216; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUZAdIILli_k; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A99EC159497; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F204243EC0; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VySvLIJpXsGo; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:646:8b02:4e40:60e5:672a:e81e:c8b7] (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8b02:4e40:60e5:672a:e81e:c8b7]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27CF1424B432; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <609C56BC-F2D8-4A9C-83F5-0520D77242E0@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:17:08 -0700
Cc: Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr>, "teas-ads@ietf.org" <teas-ads@ietf.org>, "hejia@huawei.com" <hejia@huawei.com>, "italo.busi@huawei.com" <italo.busi@huawei.com>, 윤빈영 <byyun@etri.re.kr>, "peter.park@kt.com" <peter.park@kt.com>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3583F1BB-28B6-43B6-A2AB-289511134C8B@amsl.com>
References: <20220712223705.331A84C0A2@rfcpa.amsl.com> <p7j5epje3kfn.p7j5epjb4u0z.g1@dooray.com> <D87ABDE2-3EB0-4C59-AD06-7768C2278ED3@amsl.com> <609C56BC-F2D8-4A9C-83F5-0520D77242E0@juniper.net>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/QwYlthoarnbzUOvTg8AghdbpjXc>
Subject: Re: [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:17:15 -0000

Hi, John.  We have noted your approval:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9270

Thank you!

RFC Editor/lb

> On Jul 21, 2022, at 8:29 AM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Lynne,
> 
>> On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:13 PM, Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Jeong-dong and *AD (John),
>> 
>> * John, per our process, we will need your approval for the removal of "MUST" in Section 4, Paragraph 2 (just after Figure 1).
> 
> Yes, this change is fine, thanks for checking.
> 
> —John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email