Re: [Autoconf] Request to publish draft-ietf-autoconf-manetarch-07.txt

Shubhranshu wrote:
[...]
>    4. Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document that
> you believe
> the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps you are
> uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or have concerns
> whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if your issues
> have been discussed in the WG and the WG has indicated it that it
> still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns in the
> write-up.
> 
> NO.

No?

I've just raised yesterday an issue about multicast interpretation 
confusion between manetarch and problem statement documents.  HAs that 
been solved already?  A decision made?  The issue is here, and the 
following thread keeps the subject:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf/current/msg00771.html

Was there a decision made with respect to this issue?  It seems like the 
confusing issue around multicast that I've raised is completely ignored??

Alex
PS: I removed IESG from Cc to not create further problems.  But you
     understand what I mean.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf