IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Autoconf] Request to publish draft-ietf-autoconf-manetarch-07.txt

"Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com> Wed, 21 November 2007 14:46 UTC

Return-path: <autoconf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iuqqe-0006N7-Cl; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:40 -0500
Received: from autoconf by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iuqqd-0006Iu-4T for autoconf-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:39 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iuqqc-0006Gs-QO for autoconf@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:38 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuqqW-00078y-Re for autoconf@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:38 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2007 09:46:32 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lALEkWrF016358; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:32 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lALEkWKH019723; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:46:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.43]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:30 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Autoconf] Request to publish draft-ietf-autoconf-manetarch-07.txt
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:46:30 -0500
Message-ID: <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76404F8C206@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <47443507.6020105@gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Autoconf] Request to publish draft-ietf-autoconf-manetarch-07.txt
Thread-Index: AcgsRADU/Jwd43PGQhORi6LtcRt8vgACP5kg
From: "Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, Shubhranshu <shubranshu@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2007 14:46:30.0942 (UTC) FILETIME=[4DCCA3E0:01C82C4D]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2033; t=1195656392; x=1196520392; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sratliff@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Stan=20Ratliff=20(sratliff)=22=20<sratliff@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Autoconf]=20Request=20to=20publish=20draft-ietf-auto conf-manetarch-07.txt |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Alexandru=20Petrescu=22=20<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, =0A=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=22Shubhranshu=22=20<shubranshu@gmail.com>; bh=g3hknJLdemQtXiVkwSD+xvtaaNekn/UM5IHVUB/5d6E=; b=nH1XwxWB5esckSyDT0JyFXvv1VaWQWOieAL7v32TxXRn95GFVC9JNL4sBusgELkgant6FK3c isET+VCEcXDf6v5dmktcFr8HBJr8AOnQA2Mgn6ASetaanA7c5j2hKjvR;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=sratliff@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autoconf-bounces@ietf.org

I agree with Alex -- there is a sufficient amount of confusion
or difference of opinion that I think it's premature to push the
draft at this time. 

Regards,
Stan 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:39 AM
>To: Shubhranshu
>Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Request to publish 
>draft-ietf-autoconf-manetarch-07.txt
>
>
>Shubhranshu wrote:
>[...]
>>    4. Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this 
>document that
>> you believe
>> the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps you are
>> uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or have concerns
>> whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if your issues
>> have been discussed in the WG and the WG has indicated it that it
>> still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns in the
>> write-up.
>> 
>> NO.
>
>No?
>
>I've just raised yesterday an issue about multicast interpretation 
>confusion between manetarch and problem statement documents.  HAs that 
>been solved already?  A decision made?  The issue is here, and the 
>following thread keeps the subject:
>http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf/current/msg00771.html
>
>Was there a decision made with respect to this issue?  It 
>seems like the 
>confusing issue around multicast that I've raised is 
>completely ignored??
>
>Alex
>PS: I removed IESG from Cc to not create further problems.  But you
>     understand what I mean.
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Autoconf mailing list
>Autoconf@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email