Re: [Autoconf] Request to publish draft-ietf-autoconf-manetarch-07.txt

Shubhranshu wrote:
> Alex,
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexandru Petrescu" 
> <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> To: "Shubhranshu" 
> <shubranshu@gmail.com>
>> Shubhranshu wrote: [...]
>>> 4. Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document 
>>> that you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of? For 
>>> example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts of the 
>>> document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for it.
>>>  In any event, if your issues have been discussed in the WG and 
>>> the WG has indicated it that it still wishes to advance the 
>>> document, detail those concerns in the write-up.
>>> 
>>> NO.
>> No?
>> 
>> I've just raised yesterday an issue about multicast interpretation
>>  confusion between manetarch and problem statement documents.  HAs 
>> that been solved already?  A decision made?  The issue is here, and
>>  the following thread keeps the subject: 
>> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf/current/msg00771.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Was there a decision made with respect to this issue?  It seems 
>> like the confusing issue around multicast that I've raised is 
>> completely ignored??
>> 
> 
> If the community thinks there are issues that really needs to be 
> addressed before moving this document forward then I'd be willing to
>  ask for postponement.
> 
> Why do you think there is a WGLC in the process ? I remember you 
> saying at the WG mailing list, about a couple of weeks after WGLC for
>  this ID ended, that you have some comments on section 5.1 but 
> "Otherwise - yes, I'm fine with the document." !!

Shubhranshu: yes, until I stumbled across this inconsistency
with respect to multicast in the problem-statement document.

> According to the ID authors those comments were minor in nature and 
> is addressed in the later version. I am not sure if you or anyone 
> would not have any confusion or new thoughts even after, say, one 
> year of further discussions.

I will not stir this any further.

Alex

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf