Re: [AVTCORE] SSRC multiplexing of RTP

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Mon, 14 March 2011 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8991A3A6D9D for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Or-HUlQhpchS for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213A93A6D6C for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; l=1677; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1300123862; x=1301333462; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=njZbNleHkq/O2MJRS6ygGnpINLBr2za+MFFYKiONv6Y=; b=KwYOp1xlIA/Q4QxWZtqHZ1qGzA0WaIIjC3B95NUZNztZB5nyQvL51s+6 u28K63Q4gCiLnsxCbhD7zwsMjGV43gIDmCpcAVbH8RaEaU5oC6ky7vVmm TAAonHqVj5dlfevnys/RuMxjrnwCGsysUKkLjaS4A99FmToCnJk8HqMBF o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvEAAO7tfU2tJXG//2dsb2JhbACYRI1Gd6QTnBmFYgSFK4p7iGs
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,316,1297036800"; d="scan'208";a="276280646"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2011 17:31:00 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2EHUnCB010732; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:31:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:31:00 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:30:15 -0700
Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540E8ABC69@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <19838.19728.906691.771074@amman.clic.cs.columbia.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] SSRC multiplexing of RTP
Thread-Index: Acvia2JwdIeHzSkvRqSTMP12iiJvRwAAVeIw
References: <11120238-4159-4BA7-B150-0B28E86651B3@cisco.com><4D7798A9.7080006@omnitor.se> <4D779F79.8090001@ericsson.com><4D79FEC3.9060204@alvestrand.no> <4D7E3F9C.4010505@ericsson.com> <19838.19728.906691.771074@amman.clic.cs.columbia.edu>
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: lennox@cs.columbia.edu, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2011 17:31:00.0074 (UTC) FILETIME=[95AE6CA0:01CBE26D]
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] SSRC multiplexing of RTP
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:29:40 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of lennox@cs.columbia.edu
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:15 PM
> To: Magnus Westerlund
> Cc: Harald Alvestrand; avt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] SSRC multiplexing of RTP
> 
> On Monday, March 14 2011, "Magnus Westerlund" wrote to "Harald Alvestrand, avt@ietf.org" saying:
> 
> > > - if it is a new stream, how to tell that it's a new stream
> > > - if it is an old stream, renumbered, how to tell what the old stream was
> >
> > I don't think the specs are that unclear on what is what. You do need
> > the CNAME to determine which case it is. Sure it can be clarified. I
> > mostly think the issue is with the state of the implementations. They
> > haven't considered the implications and need for multiple SSRC support.
> 
> There are valid cases where multiple independent streams will have the same
> CNAME -- if they're multiple sources from the same participant.  Multiple
> video streams in the Telepresence/CLUE environment are probably the current
> most prominent example of this, but generally, this will be the case if you
> have multiple streams that all need to be synchronized together.

CNAME would be used to relate a source stream with its FEC stream as well. The cname guidelines document is a useful read:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-05

-acbegen
 
> --
> Jonathan Lennox
> lennox@cs.columbia.edu
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt