Re: [AVTCORE] comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-05

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 07 November 2011 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1595A21F848B for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:21:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.246
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.353, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2Qc9FdhJGVM for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608921F8484 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LUA00KU01NHM6@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:21:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LUA00K8K1ME5W@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:21:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml201-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AEU34956; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:20:58 +0800
Received: from SZXEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.60) by szxeml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:20:55 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.130) by szxeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:20:48 +0800
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:20:47 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.130]
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, avt@ietf.org
Message-id: <C7E873DD2F574ACCA02F6CCABE05B4E5@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <E1CBF4C7095A3D4CAAAEAD09FBB8E08C05B4B569@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-05
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:21:31 -0000

Hi, Charles:
Thank for your valuable comments, please see my reply below.

Regards!
-Qin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: <avt@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 6:30 AM
Subject: [AVTCORE] comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-05


>I read the draft and have the following comments:
> 
> Section 2 and 3 contain some definitions. Should we add definitions
> there for additional terms, including interval metric, cumulative
> metric, and sampled metric. There has been some debate on the
> definitions of these on xrblock alias, and it would be good to have a
> consistent definition of these terms.

[Qin]: Fair, will add them into the update.

> Section 3 reads, " The Metric Block exposes real time Application
> Quality information". Section 2 defined transport level, application
> level, and end system metrics. As such, the use of "application quality
> information" seems too specific and limiting to me.

[Qin]: Correct, how about change as "QoS/QoE metric information".

> 
> Section 5.2 read, There may be situation where more than one media
> transport protocols are used by one application to interconnect to the
> same session in the gateway.  For example, one RTCP XR Packet is sent to
> the participating endpoints using non- RTP-based media transport (e.g.,
> using SIP) in a VOIP session, one crucial factor lies in how to handle
> their different identities that are corresponding to different media
> transport."
> Are we really expecting RTCP XR packets to be used outside of an RTP
> session? Or are we trying to say there may be multiple RTP sessions for
> a given VoIP session, and there is a need to be able to correlate the
> RTCP XR packets from each of these RTP sessions with each other?


[Qin]: Yes, this section focuses on describing correlation of RTP session with Non-RTP 
session for monitoring purpose. You may read RFC5104 for an example but not limited 
to this.

> Nits:
> 
> Section 4:
> - change " may have different monitoring requirements, design large
> block ..." to " may have different monitoring requirements. Designing
> large block ..."
> - change " it is hardly to provide" to " it is hard to provide"
> - change " block types For example" to " block types.  For example"
> - change " consecutive metric interval" to " consecutive metric
> intervals"

[Qin]: Fixed, thanks very much.

> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>