[AVTCORE] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-16: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In the abstract and intro, it promises "end-to-end latency confined to a
fraction of a frame".

I am not sure what to make of this guarantee. Latency is a measure of time and
a frame is measured in ... bytes?

Moreover, end-to-end latency is mostly a property of the path, and not
something an encoding format can promise.