[AVT] Fwd: Next steps for draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Sat, 22 May 2010 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7613A6C53 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 May 2010 04:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E5OwpA7HtTYI for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 May 2010 04:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E1E3A6C52 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 May 2010 04:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.234.34.9] ([217.41.234.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4MBI6lX016540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 22 May 2010 06:18:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:18:01 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B764B9B3-DB11-4ED5-A112-08FA3D2E8E74@nostrum.com>
References: <022001caf81f$b5fc5cd0$21f51670$%roni@huawei.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 217.41.234.143 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: [AVT] Fwd: Next steps for draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 11:19:09 -0000

All -

Based on IESG feedback, we are planning handle the registrations for the use of SEED with
SRTP the same way it is handled for TLS and CMS. Dan will add text to the introduction similar
to Section 1.1 of RFC4162 and make a few minor edits to make it even more clear that
the mandatory to implement requirements in Section 5 of this document apply only to SRTP
implementations that support SEED. Note there are clarifications already added to the document
in response to its last IESG review reinforcing that this document does not make SEED mandatory
to implement.

I will take the document back to the IESG for approval as Proposed Standard (it was previously
processed as Informational). Assuming the document clears in this form, I propose we not move
forward with draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp.

Please comment soon if you think we should be taking a different path.

Thanks,

RjS