[AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status
"rontlv" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 23 May 2010 07:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635623A6AE8 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 May 2010 00:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.724, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id svHZousH8vWe for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 May 2010 00:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D85D3A6AA4 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2010 00:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so1875251fxm.31 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2010 00:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=9kJVFZBB6+fHKdz+u054Rzo5uljUj9FS4nF68MWOpbM=; b=sKqGL4jtInXG5jtsi1UsQbOkqjt0pbvgHx5IyE2ERh98sQENllP96AqIcmZit4RBRd JvEGkHrtsa4AjZRY4AuN8SSzL25MGzov8BffqyH6TnVzSsxWiyPSDApKRDcx+RfCw/ZN F7EaQ1kv3wJ3R4qxrBkO4Qr4d0PfCVIYCRXwY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=Y8nm249zWc+5TBKfwMxffqRS1kv0DRN4/H+hvmrb8WtIcaBBYeZ+l2f4W82gDWZlmK 6+Qmr1Q33EkN+rYtTaY73cnbNsg3TdgTQbxt//Sainh7KpVsDxE7GU+6OYEAe95LoXQ6 zEBPnRK6myackgeiGLheg8SznxbxbXP61zGs0=
Received: by 10.102.240.32 with SMTP id n32mr3001547muh.114.1274599365604; Sun, 23 May 2010 00:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from YOUR6108 ([109.65.30.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm10113770muh.5.2010.05.23.00.22.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 23 May 2010 00:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: rontlv <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 10:22:42 +0300
Message-ID: <4bf8d7c4.0af5660a.0e0d.55cd@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01CAFA61.E194AF70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acr6SLsYQqDY8mX0Tnm2BQOnoR2yZw==
Content-Language: he
Cc: avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 07:23:14 -0000
Hi, As part of the RAMS work we identified two issue that need to be addressed as part of the solution. Ali has submitted two document: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-begen-avt-rtcp-port-for-ssm-01 defines a new attribute to allow the multicast sender to use its desired port for RTCP. We intend to suggest it as a WG item. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-begen-avt-rtp-cnames-01 addresses the issue of unique cname. This draft has received comments and we intend to suggest it as a WG item once they addressed Please review the two documents so that we can ask t have this two as WG documents. Thanks Roni Even AVT co-chair
- [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status rontlv
- Re: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status DRAGE, Keith (Keith)