Re: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status
"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Mon, 24 May 2010 15:28 UTC
Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B79C3A69EC for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 08:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.365, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5f24hRHOa8T for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 08:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046983A69D8 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 08:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAFc4+kurR7H+/2dsb2JhbACeCnGmFZlXhRMEg0E
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,291,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="328719988"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2010 15:27:52 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4OFRqqx024761; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:27:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 24 May 2010 08:27:52 -0700
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:28:07 -0700
Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540C30248F@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4bf8d7c4.0af5660a.0e0d.55cd@mx.google.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status
Thread-Index: Acr6SLsYQqDY8mX0Tnm2BQOnoR2yZwBDMHKA
References: <4bf8d7c4.0af5660a.0e0d.55cd@mx.google.com>
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: rontlv <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, avt@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2010 15:27:52.0161 (UTC) FILETIME=[ACB1DD10:01CAFB55]
Cc: avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:28:01 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of rontlv > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 3:23 AM > To: avt@ietf.org > Cc: avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status > > Hi, > > As part of the RAMS work we identified two issue that need to be addressed as part of the solution. > Ali has submitted two document: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-begen-avt-rtcp-port-for-ssm-01 defines a new attribute to allow the > multicast sender to use its desired port for RTCP. We intend to suggest it as a WG item. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-begen-avt-rtp-cnames-01 addresses the issue of unique cname. This > draft has received comments and we intend to suggest it as a WG item once they addressed Here is the revision. We received many in-the-list and offline comments, and this version addresses those comments. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-avt-rtp-cnames/ Thanks, -acbegen > > > > Please review the two documents so that we can ask t have this two as WG documents. > > > > Thanks > > Roni Even > > AVT co-chair > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5138 (20100522) > __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com
- [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status rontlv
- Re: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [AVT] RTCP port for SSM and CNAME status DRAGE, Keith (Keith)