[AVT] New milestones approved

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 08 December 2010 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CF93A68C1 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:07:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.651, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rhJkw3tHwy5Z for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092DA3A686B for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id oB8N9OTV015560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.64]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:09:24 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:09:22 +0100
Thread-Topic: New milestones approved
Thread-Index: AcuXLPMevxpNqXBLSfGHwDVYnkLFdQ==
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E3D652F@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: [AVT] New milestones approved
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:07:58 -0000

(As WG cochair)

AVT now has some new approved milestones as follows.

Feb 2011  Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP)  
May 2011  RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as proposed standard  
Oct 2011  RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level indication as proposed standard  
Oct 2011  RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level indication as proposed standard 

Over the next few weeks we will progressively make calls for the adoption of text to fulful these milestones, starting at the end of next week (and taking account of the Christmas period).

This message therefore requests two things.

1)	Can the authors of the following drafts ensure that your text is at the best status to make such a call. Please take into account recent discussions and review your documents, and update them if necessary. 

If you are planning a revision, then please do send a message to the WG chairs, identifying potential timescales for that revision. (It is so embarassing to make a call to adopt a particular version of the document, and find it revised 3 hours later)

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-avt-srtp-vbr-audio/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-avt-retransmission-supression-rtp/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-avt-slic/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-level-exthdr/ 

2)	If anybody has alternative ideas they wish to write up to fulfil these work areas, then this is the time to do it.

If you are planning this, then a message to the WG chairs of your intention is also appropriate (along with your envisaged timescales for submission).


regards

Keith