Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen

Hi,
The current text in the draft describe a possible use case for SVC and does
not add any value to the SVC draft.
I got some impression that the authors would like to describe such
application where the receiver will be able to request specific layers
compositions using some parameters which are not specified, this is not for
SVC but should be a separate draft that may expand the image attribute draft
in MMUSIC.

Roni Even as individual

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Tom Taylor
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 6:47 PM
> To: IETF AVT WG
> Subject: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
> 
> Given that SVC hasn't quite been put to bed, I would like to draw the
> WG's
> attention to draft-nanwang-avt-svc-multiscreen-00.txt.
> 
> The original intention of the author was that this text be added to the
> SVC
> draft. Could I ask for comment from the WG on whether that is sensible
> or
> whether it is better to develop a separate document? Further: how does
> this
> relate to draft-wang-avt-rtp-mvc, which was agreed to be a WG item at
> the Dublin
> meeting once the SVC work was done?
> 
> Tom Taylor
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt