Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Mon, 14 December 2009 18:02 UTC
Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F90A3A68F1 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:02:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.613
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.986, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqZTuKdd1m9c for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stewe.org (stewe.org [85.214.122.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31DF3A68C1 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (unverified [71.202.146.15]) by stewe.org (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 522544-1743317 for multiple; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:02:07 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:01:55 -0800
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "Stuart Taylor (sttaylor)" <sttaylor@cisco.com>, IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C74BBD93.1E422%stewe@stewe.org>
Thread-Topic: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
Thread-Index: Acp8E/f5pOZpjEfjTxWTmGe87kI10AAI53PAACtannAAAKFH3A==
In-Reply-To: <A50808205D76B94281544D469ADB8DB96D9CB3@XMB-RCD-106.cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: 71.202.146.15
X-Authenticated-User: stewe@stewe.org
X-ORBS-Stamp: Your IP (71.202.146.15) was found in the spamhaus database. http://www.spamhaus.net
Subject: Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:02:22 -0000
Stuart, On 12/14/09 9:51 AM, "Stuart Taylor (sttaylor)" <sttaylor@cisco.com> wrote: > [...] > I was hoping that the authors of > draft-ietf-avt-rtp-svc-20 would at least respond to this proposal, but > apparently it has been ignored. You are jumping to conclusions. Give us some more time. Stephan > > Stuart Taylor > Cisco Systems > > > -----Original Message----- > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Roni Even > Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 4:07 PM > To: 'Tom Taylor'; 'IETF AVT WG' > Subject: Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen > > Hi, > The current text in the draft describe a possible use case for SVC and > does > not add any value to the SVC draft. > I got some impression that the authors would like to describe such > application where the receiver will be able to request specific layers > compositions using some parameters which are not specified, this is not > for > SVC but should be a separate draft that may expand the image attribute > draft > in MMUSIC. > > Roni Even as individual > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Tom Taylor >> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 6:47 PM >> To: IETF AVT WG >> Subject: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen >> >> Given that SVC hasn't quite been put to bed, I would like to draw the >> WG's >> attention to draft-nanwang-avt-svc-multiscreen-00.txt. >> >> The original intention of the author was that this text be added to > the >> SVC >> draft. Could I ask for comment from the WG on whether that is sensible >> or >> whether it is better to develop a separate document? Further: how does >> this >> relate to draft-wang-avt-rtp-mvc, which was agreed to be a WG item at >> the Dublin >> meeting once the SVC work was done? >> >> Tom Taylor >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Audio/Video Transport Working Group >> avt@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Working Group > avt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Working Group > avt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] SVC and multiscreen Tom Taylor
- Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen Stephan Wenger
- Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen Roni Even
- Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen Stuart Taylor (sttaylor)
- Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen Stephan Wenger
- Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen Ye-Kui Wang