Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Mon, 14 December 2009 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F90A3A68F1 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:02:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.613
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.986, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqZTuKdd1m9c for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stewe.org (stewe.org [85.214.122.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31DF3A68C1 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (unverified [71.202.146.15]) by stewe.org (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 522544-1743317 for multiple; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:02:07 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:01:55 -0800
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "Stuart Taylor (sttaylor)" <sttaylor@cisco.com>, IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C74BBD93.1E422%stewe@stewe.org>
Thread-Topic: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
Thread-Index: Acp8E/f5pOZpjEfjTxWTmGe87kI10AAI53PAACtannAAAKFH3A==
In-Reply-To: <A50808205D76B94281544D469ADB8DB96D9CB3@XMB-RCD-106.cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: 71.202.146.15
X-Authenticated-User: stewe@stewe.org
X-ORBS-Stamp: Your IP (71.202.146.15) was found in the spamhaus database. http://www.spamhaus.net
Subject: Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:02:22 -0000

Stuart,


On 12/14/09 9:51 AM, "Stuart Taylor (sttaylor)" <sttaylor@cisco.com> wrote:

> [...]
> I was hoping that the authors of
> draft-ietf-avt-rtp-svc-20 would at least respond to this proposal, but
> apparently it has been ignored.

You are jumping to conclusions.  Give us some more time.

Stephan

> 
> Stuart Taylor
> Cisco Systems
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Roni Even
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 4:07 PM
> To: 'Tom Taylor'; 'IETF AVT WG'
> Subject: Re: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
> 
> Hi,
> The current text in the draft describe a possible use case for SVC and
> does
> not add any value to the SVC draft.
> I got some impression that the authors would like to describe such
> application where the receiver will be able to request specific layers
> compositions using some parameters which are not specified, this is not
> for
> SVC but should be a separate draft that may expand the image attribute
> draft
> in MMUSIC.
> 
> Roni Even as individual
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Tom Taylor
>> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 6:47 PM
>> To: IETF AVT WG
>> Subject: [AVT] SVC and multiscreen
>> 
>> Given that SVC hasn't quite been put to bed, I would like to draw the
>> WG's
>> attention to draft-nanwang-avt-svc-multiscreen-00.txt.
>> 
>> The original intention of the author was that this text be added to
> the
>> SVC
>> draft. Could I ask for comment from the WG on whether that is sensible
>> or
>> whether it is better to develop a separate document? Further: how does
>> this
>> relate to draft-wang-avt-rtp-mvc, which was agreed to be a WG item at
>> the Dublin
>> meeting once the SVC work was done?
>> 
>> Tom Taylor
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
>> avt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt