IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 24 February 2022 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39313A0F29 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:46:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MwZbrIgHJYwf for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB48D3A0F0F for <babel@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id c14so3995958ioa.12 for <babel@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:45:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GSrBQqqZisQNhypAYEJOuMiuGa4RpQc9ZnElngVNtiU=; b=Itn/hyMEfYXVnlVT7tjhg3Wrdep1enakJBJzqpNyYUCr7BZMJWA1E6pS5fMZNnruEb xcqynUELDMYLnF0LLYFubMxfsiqSRuyIbaz4MDfGWcaJoCn7VET+GdbGZHMl9stGnuS1 0DheGkQmgEaPxb6pnhFvOhHYwfA8aNLCGAdG0PvPzNsmKusEFZtD+nuSqwSc1XUg61/W rbIrhJIyYsDhRs8ZFk7L6s84Cdj/iXnN+X4Ma6dvNjalFQy0JwKALFOgrAcMf+x6bvW2 s4NTDgrRknN6AEy4DODmcsrWk8OrSWEHzpvjQ3EzifzAosjv5zf7jw8fUf8l7a1Xl94o i7zQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GSrBQqqZisQNhypAYEJOuMiuGa4RpQc9ZnElngVNtiU=; b=4mRqCTTdXmjCaIeToL4znOWNalGt8il34ch9Z8Hi7H6jGE/+mqojYtbVmgXPEFw3zr gfVilC0BwQDKYU8egdxMrazLMbsJPj5ErD1iS+5UTqdhCu+VT+G+j6IR4dWED6wda1jd 56lXIv7Vs5tJTJkLo79/Nsw4lAzIl4wS/3KenEfonIcenp/cTIY3ieFVSTsvIs30MMjb J9QG8H1wyQUukrgT/Q+7Myxt5bu+lcuOsK8UuPiH0BPg6U1RBztcdjX97PitGL6q1tT5 xDK+fR6wjJ2PcpJBDFomFtVBDA/h4dP7pft+7yecEsmRYkQRKG4d+o1xYi8HQSP+Rsin g3OQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GGmhQZo5rrFqahKh4SSDYzW+ogeIjgsTRQbnmxlX4+vIUFMWa g6W9SyeG0KDOhhiMjRFv3OG8076GE95/yNK8sT9IWPG2uzQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIjs8JuKWKdFNiyup3R4HLodowy3sZlYuX0UKh1IOHbsyVxBC3cqgJdJ/xD4V+Ol9WAcpoDFKtN/duk9vV89I=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:4901:b0:315:29c2:a6ec with SMTP id cx1-20020a056638490100b0031529c2a6ecmr3374133jab.282.1645731958471; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:45:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164494317027.28650.14757870981223215331@ietfa.amsl.com> <87sfs8yy1c.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87sfs8yy1c.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:45:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+1HxRhLKuw6-PPstwU2PngWyrei-SxKYsHtoCf+-DEyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7d7ac05d8c8d40f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/49exsUGwwMV9FbKJjaAh3euTB9Q>
Subject: Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 19:46:06 -0000

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 12:28 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> > I'm not saying that the "v4-via-v6" is a *bad* idea, but I really don't
> think
> > that it should be introduced / documented in a Standards Track Babel
> document -
> > it touches core plumbing, and should be discussed and documented in a
> V6OPS (or
> > 6MAN) document, and then this document includes it by reference.
>
> The document has been made Experimental, as you propose.
>

... and just for completeness, I've already updated my ballot to NoObj.


>
> > I'm sure that this DISCUSS will be frustrating to the authors/WG
>
> Not really.  We're planning to deploy this spring, barring any unforeseen
> issues, and the document being Experimental will make it easier to say "we
> told you so!" when we've broken everyone's networks ;-)
>

:-P
W



> -- Juliusz
>


-- 
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
  -- E. W. Dijkstra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email