IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 24 February 2022 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EC03A0ABC; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AyMFWTBtAXx2; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF583A107C; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 21OHSH7a009688; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:28:17 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74D2C68DB; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:28:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id B9QYVyRAYo2O; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:28:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BC6DC68D8; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:28:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:28:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87sfs8yy1c.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <164494317027.28650.14757870981223215331@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <164494317027.28650.14757870981223215331@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:28:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 6217C031.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 6217C031.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 6217C031.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/Kl15OBvOMsUZ0AkYIEG24mxh05Y>
Subject: Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:29:03 -0000

> I'm not saying that the "v4-via-v6" is a *bad* idea, but I really don't think
> that it should be introduced / documented in a Standards Track Babel document -
> it touches core plumbing, and should be discussed and documented in a V6OPS (or
> 6MAN) document, and then this document includes it by reference.

The document has been made Experimental, as you propose.

> I'm sure that this DISCUSS will be frustrating to the authors/WG

Not really.  We're planning to deploy this spring, barring any unforeseen
issues, and the document being Experimental will make it easier to say "we
told you so!" when we've broken everyone's networks ;-)

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email