IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Thu, 17 February 2022 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9313A006A; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 05:19:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZEdp8Pz9heLU; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 05:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a0c:4d80:42:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA283A00DB; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 05:19:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1645103942; bh=ODL8rFOLJfzJQ+I7ynv3qygZPbvPfdahWSsG6NW5RhU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ACJkFP38jZVCaVIYeu7qS/By2b9QEIQrQFilHtahKULFv7D1vJDWiPmrWhflxQoHV c4EudBCAGwA86GUziaRGomgVboPZKNTo+VEhs9Q8KJcaypndP5qtBL2ZqqsPzZbh7a ELTbdGoA9WSmMVTOry22ZFitgH07pNGiNvQZZPlSwSDLCZQ3yAq+NX2D08BquXXbb9 VtS1QiXFQFrlG7UAtM8PhljmhZpraeSqAhQRZtdmJSj/kBzZQwWiRgZBS0bLzPI4S9 hVv9k2tFhpfXtvm8+wdUC92CJxZ1cx4JViXcyJA1wDkW257wFS2bTh9Ej0ngfh070V hQN+PxY8PX3Xg==
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Cc: babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEF2xoVrvVGsjKEHnhoMEmuvzPTnS8TaY9m71mtYYR38Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEF2xoVrvVGsjKEHnhoMEmuvzPTnS8TaY9m71mtYYR38Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:19:02 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87a6ep4omx.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/5F2JU4iQjinwwdNV4kouU_dPewI>
Subject: Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:19:15 -0000

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> As you have seen, Warren Kumari is currently blocking this draft,
> which the IESG will be considering during their telechat tomorrow. The
> best solution at this point would seem to be to change the status of
> the draft to Experimental.
>
> Juliusz: I assume you have no objection to this since that was the
> status you originally suggested.
>
> Does anyone else object, given the circumstances, to changing the
> target status of this draft to Experimental?

I think it may be overly cautious, but that is more of a side note than
an actual objection. So sure, fine with me :)

-Toke

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email