IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 17 February 2022 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D9D3A0CA9; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 01:35:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bd7UuqzSlHHb; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 01:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87023A0C94; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 01:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 21H9Z2JG002915; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:35:02 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643D8FABB7; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:35:02 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id fmaBls0AeuyN; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:35:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF6F7FABB4; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:34:59 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:34:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87pmnlq1j0.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEF2xoVrvVGsjKEHnhoMEmuvzPTnS8TaY9m71mtYYR38Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEF2xoVrvVGsjKEHnhoMEmuvzPTnS8TaY9m71mtYYR38Bg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:35:02 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 620E16C6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 620E16C6.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 620E16C6.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/aSBGUP-nhazCFPXXtmY2aEsNmQ8>
Subject: Re: [babel] Warren Kumari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6-07
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:35:12 -0000

> As you have seen, Warren Kumari is currently blocking this draft,
> which the IESG will be considering during their telechat tomorrow. The
> best solution at this point would seem to be to change the status of
> the draft to Experimental.
> 
> Juliusz: I assume you have no objection to this since that was the
> status you originally suggested.

Yes, I think it's a good idea.  I think it would also address the
misgivings of Robert Wilton and Roman Danyliw.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email