Re: [babel] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-05: (with COMMENT)
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Mon, 12 February 2024 23:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836E8C14F6B5; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:14:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=irif.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7B-I2wi4UH2U; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:14:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9591C14F6F0; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:14:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 41CNEVMm011070; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:14:31 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0769A137E; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:14:29 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=irif.fr; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date :received:received; s=dkim-irif; t=1707779668; x=1708643669; bh= lMkjPm/5GL7e6csHEuL0sB3gLi4pIwBe7nM1mZgMCrM=; b=su0jW1G0y1Iq2y9b czWCxKuhDOnu230Avd43DpPvizY3sgyphN1SrcjP2biTMru4bbNb5WRTWG+E6PUP piyxWxV+iQ3iheoyejEbNowdqsZ+lASV9IdGzvF4WCPsVMJ/vx2f2ltlt0NtOqQQ Zp0+qmOaRIBjq31TFyLkhRxelUINX/7fmAua4Hhy0oJt3V7+1BDk86yOWq0sKb3q GpSXTRPAUtTUk2ICYMmVnY4NhyBV3jL4SLmmnOYCbqR0v22bNHW1NaREaspaAwiy 4eEWSWtUhl2iBdZ3rz4rxqBmQrbhN+9b54elrsf0Q/Vk/J/n5j8LS5lv12IZZt8w WKGWKg==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id OvaOLe9vNF88; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:14:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E34EDA1228; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:14:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:14:27 +0100
Message-ID: <87cyt11dik.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension@ietf.org, babel-chairs@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <170768378436.35000.5381407607993423332@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <170768378436.35000.5381407607993423332@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/29.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:14:31 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 65CAA657.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 65CAA657.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 65CAA657.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/HlZxotp6gbu5l91vlTYL_Ky34MU>
Subject: Re: [babel] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 23:14:41 -0000
Thanks, Erik. > ### S3.2 > > * Up to you, but it occurs to me that in this final paragraph you might also > note that any routers using NTP can manage their clock drift, further > minimizing the likelihood of impacting the RTT calculation described here. I'll add a sentence to this effect. > ### S4.1 > > * Even within an Experimental subsection within a Standards Track document, > itself a bit unusual, it seems odd to have text like "our implementation" > and "we have/have not ...". Can this be reworded to avoid giving the > impression that there's an IETF-approved implementation? Perhaps something > like "At least one implementation", "One or more implementations are known > to ...", or something? Agreed. "One implementation" sound fine to me. Thanks again, -- Juliusz
- [babel] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-b… Erik Kline via Datatracker
- Re: [babel] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ie… Juliusz Chroboczek