Re: [babel] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-07: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Juliusz... I appreciate the response, and thanks for addressing my
comments.

Barry

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:29 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thanks for your comments.
>
> > — Section 5.2 —
> > Please expand “AE” on first use.
>
> Done.
>
> >    A node MUST NOT send
> >    a wildcard retraction with an attached source prefix, and a node that
> >    receives a wildcard retraction with a source prefix MUST ignore it.
>
> > The “it” here is ambiguous: please specify “MUST ignore the source
> prefix” or
> > “MUST ignore the retraction”.  The same comment applies also to the
> subsequent
> > paragraph.
>
> Done.
>
> > — Section 6.1 —
> > For what it’s worth, I don’t find the diagram to add anything to the
> text, and
> > I wouldn’t have a clue what the diagram was trying to say without the
> text.
>
> The whole section has been rewritten and moved to the introduction.
>
> >    Packets
> >    destined to D but not sourced in S will be forwarded by A to B, and
> >    by B to A, causing a persistent routing loop
>
> > That text is describing not what will happen with this standard, but what
> > *would* happen if this standard didn’t correct for it.  So please change
> “will
> > be forwarded” to”would be forwarded”,
>
> Done.  This is now Section 1.3.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Juliusz
>