Re: [babel] Babel-MAC: Blake2s is 128-bits by default

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 06 November 2020 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E908F3A0E24 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:06:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dGJEukDGWyjw for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B7A3A0E22 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:06:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 0A6N6K8D029376; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:06:21 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDA312387B; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:06:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id x2CclYmQG1Jk; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:06:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (82-64-141-196.subs.proxad.net [82.64.141.196]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4540123879; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:06:18 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 00:06:18 +0100
Message-ID: <87blgaulud.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: babel@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Barbara Stark <bs7652@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <87h7q2f6a2.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <87d00qungk.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87h7q2f6a2.fsf@toke.dk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sat, 07 Nov 2020 00:06:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5FA5D6EC.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5FA5D6EC.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5FA5D6EC.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/sUOPPZcMNfe3834AD90fcWiEmpc>
Subject: Re: [babel] Babel-MAC: Blake2s is 128-bits by default
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 23:06:28 -0000

> Okay, something seemed off about this when I read it just now, so I just
> double checked: And in fact both implementations use 32-byte Blake2s
> digest sizes...

Looking through the git history... the original version implemented by
Clara, Weronika and myself used 16-byte hashes, which was the original
intent, for the reasons outlined in my previous mail.

The version currently maintained by Antonin does indeed generate 32-byte
hashes.  While I haven't checked myself, Toke says that so does his
version, and the two versions have been shown to interoperate.

> I still support making the change and specifying the size, but to
> correspond to current implementation practice the change would need to
> be "with 256-bit (32 octet) hashes".

No strong opinion either way.  Let's give people a chance to comment.

-- Juliusz