Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy-00

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tina Tsou [mailto:tena@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 1:33 PM
> To: 'Dan Wing'; 'Stig Venaas'; 'Tom Taylor'
> Cc: behave@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-
> multicast-transition-taxonomy-00
> 
> Hi Dan,
> We have emailed all of the authors of the various drafts and ask them
> to review draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy.

Great.  Thanks!
-d


> 
> We keep our promises with one another - no matter what!
> 
> Best Regards,
> Tina TSOU
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of
> Dan Wing
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:20 PM
> To: 'Stig Venaas'; 'Tom Taylor'
> Cc: behave@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for
> draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy-00
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Stig Venaas
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:41 AM
> > To: Tom Taylor
> > Cc: behave@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-
> > multicast-transition-taxonomy-00
> >
> > On 3/1/2011 8:00 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> > > We have prepared this document to help sort out the multicast
> > > transition
> > > work in the BEHAVE and SOFTWIRES WGs. Please have a look at and
> > > comment
> > > on the conclusions.
> >
> > A good well written document :)
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > I would not use the term Multicast Topology for ASM vs SSM. Topology
> is
> > more used for network topology... ASM and SSM are generally I think,
> > referred to as different multicast service models. I would suggest
> > using
> > that term.
> >
> > That is the only change I would suggest in the draft.
> >
> > Some comments regarding ID.venaas-mcast46 though. It can be used
> > together with ID.boucadair-64-multicast-address-format, and I plan
> > to update it with a reference to that. This is maybe obvious though.
> 
> Tom, tt would be really valuable if you could email all of the
> authors of the various drafts and ask them to review
> draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy, to ensure their documents
> are all accurately summarized.
> 
> -d
> 
> > It is correct that it is from 2008. Although not relevant, I feel
> like
> > pointing out that the draft is very close to
> > draft-venaas-mboned-v4v6mcastgw-00.txt from 2003.
> >
> > Stig
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Behave mailing list
> > Behave@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave