Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy-00

> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Stig Venaas
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:41 AM
> To: Tom Taylor
> Cc: behave@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-
> multicast-transition-taxonomy-00
> 
> On 3/1/2011 8:00 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> > We have prepared this document to help sort out the multicast
> > transition
> > work in the BEHAVE and SOFTWIRES WGs. Please have a look at and
> > comment
> > on the conclusions.
> 
> A good well written document :)

Agreed.

> I would not use the term Multicast Topology for ASM vs SSM. Topology is
> more used for network topology... ASM and SSM are generally I think,
> referred to as different multicast service models. I would suggest
> using
> that term.
> 
> That is the only change I would suggest in the draft.
> 
> Some comments regarding ID.venaas-mcast46 though. It can be used
> together with ID.boucadair-64-multicast-address-format, and I plan
> to update it with a reference to that. This is maybe obvious though.

Tom, tt would be really valuable if you could email all of the 
authors of the various drafts and ask them to review 
draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy, to ensure their documents
are all accurately summarized.

-d

> It is correct that it is from 2008. Although not relevant, I feel like
> pointing out that the draft is very close to
> draft-venaas-mboned-v4v6mcastgw-00.txt from 2003.
> 
> Stig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave