IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy-00

Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> Wed, 02 March 2011 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8775B3A68BC for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:31:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTQCwjz9gKT1 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F323A68C4 for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LHG00M5T970Q6@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for behave@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TingZousc1 ([10.193.34.192]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LHG00ISE96ZIK@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for behave@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:32:59 -0800
From: Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <0e6e01cbd917$445aaee0$cd100ca0$@com>
To: 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>, 'Stig Venaas' <stig@venaas.com>, 'Tom Taylor' <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
Message-id: <034c01cbd921$672f1c80$358d5580$@com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-us
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcvZEdfl8p+7uZp2T6mMEc5Ev9jHMQABT2wAAAKJMrA=
References: <BLU0-SMTP939AF558416E58F95666B6D8C10@phx.gbl> <4D6E9D61.6030402@venaas.com> <0e6e01cbd917$445aaee0$cd100ca0$@com>
Cc: behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:31:55 -0000

Hi Dan,
We have emailed all of the authors of the various drafts and ask them to
review draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy.


We keep our promises with one another - no matter what!

Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html


-----Original Message-----
From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Dan Wing
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:20 PM
To: 'Stig Venaas'; 'Tom Taylor'
Cc: behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy-00

> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Stig Venaas
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:41 AM
> To: Tom Taylor
> Cc: behave@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-
> multicast-transition-taxonomy-00
> 
> On 3/1/2011 8:00 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> > We have prepared this document to help sort out the multicast
> > transition
> > work in the BEHAVE and SOFTWIRES WGs. Please have a look at and
> > comment
> > on the conclusions.
> 
> A good well written document :)

Agreed.

> I would not use the term Multicast Topology for ASM vs SSM. Topology is
> more used for network topology... ASM and SSM are generally I think,
> referred to as different multicast service models. I would suggest
> using
> that term.
> 
> That is the only change I would suggest in the draft.
> 
> Some comments regarding ID.venaas-mcast46 though. It can be used
> together with ID.boucadair-64-multicast-address-format, and I plan
> to update it with a reference to that. This is maybe obvious though.

Tom, tt would be really valuable if you could email all of the 
authors of the various drafts and ask them to review 
draft-tsou-multicast-transition-taxonomy, to ensure their documents
are all accurately summarized.

-d

> It is correct that it is from 2008. Although not relevant, I feel like
> pointing out that the draft is very close to
> draft-venaas-mboned-v4v6mcastgw-00.txt from 2003.
> 
> Stig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave

_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
Behave@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email