Re: [BEHAVE] (no subject)

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Thu, 27 June 2013 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CD921F9C7E for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHcfqLZ0zjCp for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DE721F9C99 for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:660:3001:4012:7ddf:d947:bc5f:fe38]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA2134040B; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:20:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <51CC03F4.5010505@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:20:52 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com>
References: <CB1B483277FEC94E9B58357040EE5D02325A6E93@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> <2f7dce8264c8a9a72640629502a44295@cacaoweb.org> <51C1681A.5030909@viagenie.ca> <f8741fad1af1cee094de9c59408b7425@cacaoweb.org> <51C40374.8080403@viagenie.ca> <21e25b7ae1501228a67656b2fa4bc009@cacaoweb.org> <51CAA20F.4070307@viagenie.ca> <CAD6AjGRwD+oZVyaR+WAN-aq511bGQVA-4oMjQq_KP6TUsUv+Jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGRwD+oZVyaR+WAN-aq511bGQVA-4oMjQq_KP6TUsUv+Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: behave@ietf.org, ivan@cacaoweb.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:21:15 -0000

Le 2013-06-26 15:56, cb.list6 a écrit :
> i have the port overloading feature and plan to use it.
>
> Furthermore, i run a substantial endpoint dependent cgn. P2p on ipv4 is
> dead, has been dead.

One of the motivations behind our draft is to describe how port 
overloading can be safely enabled without adversely affecting P2P, based 
on CGN deployment experience. Are you saying that that effort is useless?

Simon