[BEHAVE] [IANA #831872] Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)

Hi David, all,

The IANA Considerations section says, "IANA is requested to mark that identifier as OBSOLETE and to update the reference from [RFC4008] to the present document."

Should the IANA Considerations section be updated, or should the MIB be updated?

thanks,
Amanda

On Sat Jul 04 01:41:11 2015, ietfdbh@comcast.net wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
> 
> This is not correct.
> 
> the status for natMIB is DEPRECATED, not OBSOLETE
> 
> "       REVISION     "201506240000Z"
>    -- RFC Ed.: set to publication date
>         DESCRIPTION
>                 "Deprecation of all objects, published as RFC yyyy.
>                  See NAT-MIB-V2 in RFCzzzz for recommended
> replacement."
> 
> The format for deprecated assignments is
> 123     natMIB  NAT-MIB (DEPRECATED)    [RFC-perrault-behave-
> deprecate-nat-mib-v1-05]
> 
> Here is the entry for  {mib-2 68} for an example of another deprecated
> MIB module under mib-2.
> 68      vrrpMIB VRRP MIB (DEPRECATED)   [Bob_Hinden][RFC6527]
> 
> Under ifTypes, there are multiple deprecated assignments (7, 11, 62,
> 69, 117, 184, 205, 230) that also follow this format.
> 
> David Harrington
> ietfdbh@comcast.net
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 1, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> >
> > It looks good to me too.
> >
> > Thank you for your great work.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Tina
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >  From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:09 AM
> > To: drafts-approval@iana.org
> > Cc: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [IANA #830007] Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB
> > Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators
> > (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-
> > mib-v1-04.txt)
> >
> > Looks ggood, thank you.
> >
> > Tom Taylor
> >
> > On 01/07/2015 7:26 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> >> Dear Authors:
> >>
> >> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
> >>
> >> We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be:
> >>
> >> draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04
> >>
> >> IANA has updated the mib-2 registration associated with value 123 to
> >> read as follows:
> >>
> >> 123  natMIB (OBSOLETE)       NAT-MIB [RFC-perrault-behave-deprecate-
> >> nat-mib-v1-05]
> >>
> >> Please see
> >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers
> >>
> >>
> >> Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon
> >> as we receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that
> >> this document's IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a
> >> team of authors, one reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.)
> >>
> >> We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that
> >> they've assigned a number.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Amanda Baber
> >> IANA Senior Specialist
> >> ICANN
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Behave mailing list
> > Behave@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave