Re: [BEHAVE] [IANA #830007] Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)

David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Sat, 04 July 2015 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id C42411B3263; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969F51B3262 for <xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbRQb83StOFe for <xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2509E1AD291 for <draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:42]:36042) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <ietfdbh@comcast.net>) id 1ZBCI3-0002do-02 for draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:30:55 -0700
Received: from resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.98]) by resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id o1Wh1q00127uzMh011WhwH; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:30:41 +0000
Received: from [10.59.1.23] ([67.189.237.137]) by resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id o1Wd1q00D2yZEBF011WeEi; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:30:41 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_809A4400-BEE3-458B-84E3-3CDDFA3F4D61"
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A818BFB83E@szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 21:30:28 -0400
Message-Id: <78FF46EF-42AF-4B12-A255-931596BDC3F0@comcast.net>
References: <RT-Ticket-830007@icann.org> <20150624164600.27690.81498.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-9660-1435793159-1016.830007-7-0@icann.org> <5594810A.1040609@gmail.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A818BFB83E@szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com>
To: "drafts-approval@iana.org" <drafts-approval@iana.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1435973441; bh=kg/woFTob0TkGQHMFoPVFCMD0CNWoS/+m1BceoPa5BY=; h=Received:Received:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=mZHRYvspRCunR+R+Bita31B4XImZ+hcL8djH/7mzdBI5oTvvJ+mm81jxEcIhhNvdp sPCi3b5oLmm6B6SaBNJpzzfaI2BUlVyYHB0U+CPZF8rFtWPPBHH+DFX+GvVrxwVZ2F FPACkt2/Cqx03Xl5iN58XDl19nfXw33UOsQXOfZTU16iPLkagFdCPWDuHxdeuBUJZi pKiyeOHopwCJGWFVnm/yT7gY7iWykaHVh65XrTGfC4oHydxMFOogqN55lz5uCwoyuA TqwqiQxJYG8/Be1ZzB4shpuJTLWbeZhVA/NNA5fUHOhzixqp1JAiAV6emE7Y6xROAA Te03EQbziSmDQ==
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:42
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ietfdbh@comcast.net
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150704013056.2509E1AD291@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:30:56 -0700
Resent-From: ietfdbh@comcast.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools/gCd37AfonzycF81Ii_WIv8iVrvw>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/dNX9h_0V_FYu6ODWuf5dRLuXrE0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 10:20:33 -0700
Cc: "draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org>, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [IANA #830007] Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 01:30:57 -0000

Hi Amanda, 

This is not correct.

the status for natMIB is DEPRECATED, not OBSOLETE

"       REVISION     "201506240000Z"
   -- RFC Ed.: set to publication date
        DESCRIPTION
                "Deprecation of all objects, published as RFC yyyy.
                 See NAT-MIB-V2 in RFCzzzz for recommended replacement."

The format for deprecated assignments is
123	natMIB	NAT-MIB (DEPRECATED)	[RFC-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-05]

Here is the entry for  {mib-2 68} for an example of another deprecated MIB module under mib-2.
68	vrrpMIB	VRRP MIB (DEPRECATED)	[Bob_Hinden][RFC6527]

Under ifTypes, there are multiple deprecated assignments (7, 11, 62, 69, 117, 184, 205, 230) that also follow this format.

David Harrington
ietfdbh@comcast.net



On Jul 1, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> It looks good to me too.
> 
> Thank you for your great work.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Tina
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:09 AM
> To: drafts-approval@iana.org
> Cc: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IANA #830007] Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)
> 
> Looks ggood, thank you.
> 
> Tom Taylor
> 
> On 01/07/2015 7:26 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
>> Dear Authors:
>> 
>> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
>> 
>> We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be:
>> 
>> draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04
>> 
>> IANA has updated the mib-2 registration associated with value 123 to read as follows:
>> 
>> 123	natMIB (OBSOLETE)	NAT-MIB	[RFC-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-05]
>> 
>> Please see
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers
>> 
>> 
>> Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon as we receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that this document's IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a team of authors, one reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.)
>> 
>> We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that they've assigned a number.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Amanda Baber
>> IANA Senior Specialist
>> ICANN
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave