Re: [BEHAVE] [IANA #831872] Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)

I'd go with David as expert: the IANA Considerations section should be 
updated.

Tom

On 06/07/2015 1:24 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> Hi David, all,
>
> The IANA Considerations section says, "IANA is requested to mark that identifier as OBSOLETE and to update the reference from [RFC4008] to the present document."
>
> Should the IANA Considerations section be updated, or should the MIB be updated?
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
>
>
> On Sat Jul 04 01:41:11 2015, ietfdbh@comcast.net wrote:
>> Hi Amanda,
>>
>> This is not correct.
>>
>> the status for natMIB is DEPRECATED, not OBSOLETE
>>
>> "       REVISION     "201506240000Z"
>>     -- RFC Ed.: set to publication date
>>          DESCRIPTION
>>                  "Deprecation of all objects, published as RFC yyyy.
>>                   See NAT-MIB-V2 in RFCzzzz for recommended
>> replacement."
>>
>> The format for deprecated assignments is
>> 123     natMIB  NAT-MIB (DEPRECATED)    [RFC-perrault-behave-
>> deprecate-nat-mib-v1-05]
>>
>> Here is the entry for  {mib-2 68} for an example of another deprecated
>> MIB module under mib-2.
>> 68      vrrpMIB VRRP MIB (DEPRECATED)   [Bob_Hinden][RFC6527]
>>
>> Under ifTypes, there are multiple deprecated assignments (7, 11, 62,
>> 69, 117, 184, 205, 230) that also follow this format.
>>
>> David Harrington
>> ietfdbh@comcast.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> It looks good to me too.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your great work.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Tina
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>   From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:09 AM
>>> To: drafts-approval@iana.org
>>> Cc: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [IANA #830007] Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB
>>> Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators
>>> (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-
>>> mib-v1-04.txt)
>>>
>>> Looks ggood, thank you.
>>>
>>> Tom Taylor
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2015 7:26 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
>>>> Dear Authors:
>>>>
>>>> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
>>>>
>>>> We've completed the IANA Actions for the following RFC-to-be:
>>>>
>>>> draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04
>>>>
>>>> IANA has updated the mib-2 registration associated with value 123 to
>>>> read as follows:
>>>>
>>>> 123  natMIB (OBSOLETE)       NAT-MIB [RFC-perrault-behave-deprecate-
>>>> nat-mib-v1-05]
>>>>
>>>> Please see
>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know whether the above IANA Actions look OK. As soon
>>>> as we receive your confirmation, we'll notify the RFC Editor that
>>>> this document's IANA Actions are complete. (If this document has a
>>>> team of authors, one reply on behalf of everyone will suffice.)
>>>>
>>>> We'll update the reference when the RFC Editor notifies us that
>>>> they've assigned a number.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Amanda Baber
>>>> IANA Senior Specialist
>>>> ICANN
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Behave mailing list
>>> Behave@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>
>
>
>