Re: [Ietf-behave] TURN Issue #4: TLS TURN requests

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 14 December 2005 04:36 UTC

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:36:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [Ietf-behave] TURN Issue #4: TLS TURN requests
In-Reply-To: <77E0B4E8-ECDB-4399-8F5D-9F01FAAEA9BA@csperkins.org>
Message-ID: <BFC4D742.65412%fluffy@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Interesting - given that draft-ietf-avt-rtp-framing-contrans  and
draft-ietf-mmusic-comedia-tls both seem to be proceeding, I'm surprised to
hear this. I would not be surprised to see more interest in RTP over TLS.


On 12/6/05 10:16 AM, "Colin Perkins" <csp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 5 Dec 2005, at 16:29, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>> TURN allows TLS connectivity for the Shared Secret request, but not
>> for the Allocate request itself. I have gotten a request to allow
>> the Allocate request to run over TLS. Once you've swallowed the RTP-
>> over-TCP pill, I don't think this one is a big jump from there.
>> 
>> I'll note that there is currently no way in SDP that I know of to
>> signal RTP over TLS; I seem to recall from meeting minutes last
>> month in AVT this was discussed and rejected.
> 
> AVT has an existing milestone to work on RTP-over-TLS, but it seems
> no-one is interested in doing the work. The discussion in the meeting
> was that we would remove the milestone when updating our charter,
> unless there was interest.
> 
> Colin
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-behave mailing list
> Ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-behave