Re: [BEHAVE] Two questions about draft-zhou-behave-syslog-nat-logging-00

"chen" <czh7@21cn.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <czh7@21cn.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011E711E80D5 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id igWBgFZoKt1A for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 21cn.com (smtpfree.forptr.21cn.com [59.36.102.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8C111E80BA for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 10.27.2.13:48169.597865428
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from chenzhonghua-nb (unknown [10.27.2.13]) by 21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 580023846D; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:40:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from chenzhonghua-nb ([115.238.45.234]) by 21CN-Medusa4(MEDUSA 10.27.2.13) with ESMTP id 1341985255.7434 for meng.wei2@zte.com.cn ; Wed Jul 11 13:40:59 2012
0/X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
1/X-Total-Score: 0:
3/X-Total-Score: 0:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<8e868f884f98868a53619b95864f84908e4f848f8e868f884f98868a53619b95864f84908e4f848f838689829786618a8695874f909388>, score=<1341985259zjzJYjpQGIdBzzzzzJzzYzmpaym1KQPt4pppppappypp>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:40:57 +0800
From: chen <czh7@21cn.com>
To: "meng.wei2" <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>, "meng.wei2" <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>
Message-ID: <201207111340550008526@21cn.com>
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: behave <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Two questions about draft-zhou-behave-syslog-nat-logging-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 05:49:52 -0000

HI meng.wei2:

	  you are right. we just talk about the first solution in this version. because it's a mature solution ,and we already used it in our network.but we still want to make a discussion on other three methods. For it will be useful in some cases. 

      Syslog format is just for solution 1.We will need other protocol for other solutions.



        chen
        czh7@21cn.com
          2012-07-11