Re: [BEHAVE] comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive

"Zhangzongjian (Thomas)" <zhangzhongjian@huawei.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangzhongjian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30D711E80C1 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PN77fpvm7wAO for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7111E8079 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHX52822; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:42:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:39:55 -0700
Received: from SZXEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.152) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:39:53 -0700
Received: from SZXEML524-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.229]) by szxeml413-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.152]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:39:45 +0800
From: "Zhangzongjian (Thomas)" <zhangzhongjian@huawei.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, "draft-li-behave-nat444-test@tools.ietf.org" <draft-li-behave-nat444-test@tools.ietf.org>, "15301588336@189.cn" <15301588336@189.cn>, "15306188213@189.cn" <15306188213@189.cn>, "liuchunlin@jsptpd.com" <liuchunlin@jsptpd.com>, "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive
Thread-Index: Ac1e+4L5W6hTgdXpSUKgVBZ9YLoKkgAGaJ/w
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:39:44 +0000
Message-ID: <0B2F754289D27B449F7F1B95456B77544EDB63D7@szxeml524-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <085801cd5efb$8344aa50$89cdfef0$@com>
In-Reply-To: <085801cd5efb$8344aa50$89cdfef0$@com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.77.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:41:55 -0000

Dear Dan
In fact we tested the typical FTP active model as an illustration for the FTP scenarios. In such an example, the FTP server is in public networks and FTP client is in private network. Thanks for your comments. We will add the detailed description in the next version.

Thomas
Best regards


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:24 AM
To: draft-li-behave-nat444-test@tools.ietf.org; 15301588336@189.cn; 15306188213@189.cn; liuchunlin@jsptpd.com; Will Liu (Shucheng); Zhangzongjian (Thomas)
Subject: comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive

Hi.

It would be helpful in your FTP test results if you indicated if passive
(PASV) or active mode was tested.

-d