Re: [BEHAVE] comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive

["Will Liu (Shucheng)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

One thing I would like to add here is, this draft mainly focuses on the diversity of application tested. What we listed in the draft basically covers almost all the current typical popular applications. By posting this draft, we are able to show the outline of support situation of CGN for getting vast majority of applications through NAT, to both network man as well as those who are also interested in network software development. There might still be some scenarios we have not covered. If anybody is interested in those we did not mention in our draft, we are appreciated to your comments.

Have a nice day!
Will

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhangzongjian (Thomas) 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:40 AM
To: Dan Wing; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Will Liu (Shucheng)
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive

Dear Dan
In fact we tested the typical FTP active model as an illustration for the FTP scenarios. In such an example, the FTP server is in public networks and FTP client is in private network. Thanks for your comments. We will add the detailed description in the next version.

Thomas
Best regards


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Wing [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:24 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Will Liu (Shucheng); Zhangzongjian (Thomas)
Subject: comment on draft-li-behave-nat444-test-00, FTP active/passive

Hi.

It would be helpful in your FTP test results if you indicated if passive
(PASV) or active mode was tested.

-d