IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bess] 答复: SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Sat, 05 October 2019 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B05812009E for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 02:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qeW4rYENLUS5 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 02:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BAF120018 for <bess@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 02:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 59B7FECE0772ED66DC7E; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 10:35:39 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 10:35:38 +0100
Received: from lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) by lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 10:35:38 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.212) by lhreml725-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 10:35:38 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.168]) by DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.212]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:35:31 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS
Thread-Index: AQHVexMhhubJXd+HrUKKLLi5mEIBF6dLyUAN
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:35:31 +0000
Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934E764D@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <8D0ACADB-2F74-4F66-8E67-79E63E1A8FF1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D0ACADB-2F74-4F66-8E67-79E63E1A8FF1@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.209.82]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934E764DDGGEMM532MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/2v9-J4sYkGJzYh6qZPo5CtIT5Bo>
Subject: [bess] 答复: SRv6 versus SR-MPLS
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 09:35:43 -0000

Hi Gyna,

We proposed following the draft which has relation with your question. Hope it may be helpful.



https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xie-spring-srv6-network-migration-00



From my point of view, one of the best advantages of SRv6 is easy incremental deployment.

I believe there will more deployments of SRv6 soon.





Best Regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)







________________________________
发件人: BESS [bess-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Gyan Mishra [hayabusagsm@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2019年10月5日 8:22
收件人: bess@ietf.org
主题: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS


Bess,

What is the benefit of SRv6 over SR-MPLS for greenfield deployments or existing mpls deployments.

Regards,

Gyan Mishra
IT Network Engineering & Technology
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
13101 Columbia Pike<https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike?entry=gmail&source=g> FDC1 3rd Floor
<https://imailcn01.huawei.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>Silver Spring, MD 20904<https://imailcn01.huawei.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>
United States<https://imailcn01.huawei.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>
Phone: 301 502-1347<tel:301%20502-1347>
Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com<mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>
www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT<http://www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT>

Sent from my iPhone

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email