IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B15B120804 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 03:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBSIwIamsqFO for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD8E120077 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id v8so14589889wrt.2 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=ax3RhCvIEe0jaRXRN8ZvhtwWlgGvlG+M57KzwWjUIlg=; b=pQMNyMl+qoj2JR0OXpeIFxv+0zb3stfGYFtrPMxz83AT0nEjSr+1Xbe+wpJSvYqE/f W9kePV7s5WKN95pviw1BDOmgaLT0j3iu54TqkiPvj0I0O+ntq8iu1jHo+GvE92b4IGvd FlCJrx6609S+B0nbnmXHhdo+ASWSL48eQQxjS4IO6Qh2UvSXCZjFq3IL3Q+tCUGzJLGX QNIu3E+Ga3jjkH+2d9U6icZ3Ui8b01VNh0xajsLsB/1s0cjGM4ul8jqcZS3t1o1nWrWc sK2/cAs9yxTMXt1rDFF6wokNIGbh9YXlB/w7oN+334jeNuJubQy27aWaezcTn5qA7Tqe lrwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=ax3RhCvIEe0jaRXRN8ZvhtwWlgGvlG+M57KzwWjUIlg=; b=gPPI/oLGAr/g6dmqMio6h2aBJFTKV8AMeWxWHzfI1FT/z4JsA2Vd/eGWoAsnnI+iWw 7usOLGuCxQGkW06GfTs39GrPVFd3/zknh4SZvvpi0J1pQ/ofF+e/QJmDt8T3jVbcsLPU ky4TYH34L2CEm9/Sn6rW1DjSv7AT960keoAU2Wsw7+zoAzJrYSODLzd0oUVb5X2tCCkL Co7usu66uw5ZfxOfhVUMHcVAHe6Cm9Nzn3OabJnEdcHqVXAZGpASsZcltktel89Y3M7L XDYOWhdSJp4A9WfmRiWnLYTvTrmLVzq00xgA07plz7/1H/WzmY5UFgDo2Rr1Paz0XZBm B7wA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVm54IOAdWZyNRpdRYPpGeS/NzN5fjn9U9LYla0MyL4h3kJn4MP BYYfwnGa0B7D8ha+nJbTEmIB2vZ5Fn8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxiweOsM+yNtyNkjiy+Pqn6/QDcUGvJgv3Yc6fBa/Q/4GoqTwGkAVxcEDX5tumFz86n11RZsA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a09:: with SMTP id m9mr20638086wru.12.1570443561672; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Appleton.fritz.box ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm14487793wme.36.2019.10.07.03.19.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
References: <8D0ACADB-2F74-4F66-8E67-79E63E1A8FF1@gmail.com> <0C48ECF1-D889-44F9-99F1-AA69B6DD1C28@gmail.com> <CA+RyBmWSUi4ooueQ=D+rq=4UVVVepR8zb6KeAzLQ7MU=4=TFNA@mail.gmail.com> <caca288a-f85e-0d2b-0607-21dc5ebd4a13@joelhalpern.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <29c7ff28-36ca-4ce0-b968-4bbcaf7bd760@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:19:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <caca288a-f85e-0d2b-0607-21dc5ebd4a13@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/COh0-np5AnXAfSFruMmkX-1HuF4>
Subject: Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:19:25 -0000

If you need uSIDs for MTU control or restrictions on the depth that you 
can parse in the packet, you should also consider regular MPLS-SR, or in 
an IP only network draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip (RFC editor's queue).

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email