Re: [bess] 答复: SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

+1

Every technology has a number of trade-offs associated with it, one can’t assess gain/loss of a particular technology without understanding the architecture as a whole.

As long as we are comparing the technologies in the right context and based on their technical merits we come up with a great solution, that is what IETF does!
Else...

Regards,
Jeff

> On Oct 5, 2019, at 07:11, Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I second Robert.
> 
> SRv6 is yet another tool in the overall toolset, and, as with every tool, there are situations (use cases) where using this particular tool might be the optimal solution, whereas there are use cases, where other tools do the job better, and, there are use cases where using this particular tools is complete misunderstanding. There as are as well use cases, where combinations of multiple tools bring the best effect.
> 
> Thanks,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
>> On 2019-Oct-05, at 13:23, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> IMHO the question of SR-MPLS vs SRv6 is wrong as it all depends what are you trying to accomplish in your network and what services you need to run on it.
>> 
>> For example some networks need TE some do not. 
>> 
>> Some may like to carry L2/L3VPNs some do not. 
>> 
>> Some may think about requirements associated with special packet handling perhaps augmented with in house development of P4 based fancy services so do not.. 
>> 
>> Last some network are IPv4 only, some are IPv4+MPLS, some may be dual stack and some may be IPv6 only. 
>> 
>> For some the overhead associated with attaching additional data to each packet matters - so do not care and do not even realize it :).. 
>> 
>> So this is very loaded question. It is like asking should I go left or should I go right without stating your ultimate destination. Sure likely you may end up there regardless how you turn but it may not be optimal path. 
>> 
>> And last as this is BESS WG ... I would really seriously consider for BESS services use of RFC4797 and RFC7510. 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> R.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 11:35 AM Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Gyna,
>>> 
>>> We proposed following the draft which has relation with your question. Hope it may be helpful.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xie-spring-srv6-network-migration-00
>>> 
>>>  
>>> From my point of view, one of the best advantages of SRv6 is easy incremental deployment.
>>> 
>>> I believe there will more deployments of SRv6 soon.
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> Zhenbin (Robin)
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 发件人: BESS [bess-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Gyan Mishra [hayabusagsm@gmail.com]
>>> 发送时间: 2019年10月5日 8:22
>>> 收件人: bess@ietf.org
>>> 主题: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bess,
>>> 
>>> What is the benefit of SRv6 over SR-MPLS for greenfield deployments or existing mpls deployments.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Gyan Mishra 
>>> IT Network Engineering & Technology 
>>> Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
>>> 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor
>>> Silver Spring, MD 20904
>>> United States
>>> Phone: 301 502-1347
>>> Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
>>> www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BESS mailing list
>>> BESS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess