Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02
slitkows.ietf@gmail.com Mon, 21 June 2021 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE4F3A0A35; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PITdOX8LKTDh; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BD63A0A29; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id c7so18495704edn.6; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=PV4Ko01jSw07hynINooamBFCPzbvMRuIaytdHSVqPkg=; b=JMJxxiOzDEXwkgYXAh7w45eHR7NgnvBG1HtFftf0B0QAuJMacvXR7ieQWhEpz4OSpG 6FLiQfmLORQmHVyO6pD18n3hYVLEK0E3waaK0uH133gZM6rS5TdhXiFk5j81DWcK+3az be/W1nZgOTiUHTZGKAgrZI2WDfqT5PdCZ+gsgP9VpS6hO1fu9RSbL7WEytf+bo28aGQ5 ZLm29o4cvrxIuGy9UIU8OLG14oqB3BCh9IFJB/UdapRJ2Jb8Wsml4xUm/2wGsg9rgniW EEULMwpVWsGFINT8Oef+aHWY9y/35LRBsUCnaxWbSIhmea5mrzfP+s5Rfaf4RVrveu7Q gY8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=PV4Ko01jSw07hynINooamBFCPzbvMRuIaytdHSVqPkg=; b=gdb1P56zm5Mk91r/Nx8lbOugLJtRl0qOvZjUZslR23MdihPfVJ8W5YvAN5XsDCdyYd cqEOak5VVgcSs1s37AavaYkIqXhaN/XDum0hRA0aTiLPMGIFcnJRbumDm7meIts0U2Nj sfMWg0Qs4IzEkD8Dx7/ir+iGqNgDH19pYuGFBxjdF7fP3bVznua9Bcrw5fA/9SK6/Sus /2V5i35QSn9Sqrl724lPcT2PeGH0IdDoaa0+L4K4x031FIXgpZL3o9zqmoTiw5+HqEBe 90tKL9fXRFLu+FPz/CvUYSoUl2mj5U/NmsAJF/OKN6kTd44B2w38892oNToTmbpE90Q8 GrxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Fni44tiBcQnv7YDL6L+Wc7n3VfhHcexkfzyxYZsjDOE5YH4cs AizT9sZVqHK1aLf58n/I6pMRbM/SGw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNzHLWB7BhqUtE+JAN1KUkObXpJluVJALkb2zx5smGtmvdzqFT565MHTtKop25Rn1x6Td2iQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ce0b:: with SMTP id y11mr22859816edi.356.1624288185388; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SLITKOWS3YYU6 ([173.38.220.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm10700042edc.59.2021.06.21.08.09.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
To: 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa@ietf.org
Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org
References: <0aad01d755ee$ed599f10$c80cdd30$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0aad01d755ee$ed599f10$c80cdd30$@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:09:43 +0200
Message-ID: <062601d766af$77e07e30$67a17a90$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0627_01D766C0.3B6B9820"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJ6Wu0S/Z+/XdA9ydGYHWUy4D+EgKnYqLqQ
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/3N1KE-zuxNHnukC1EdjGjHt2O1M>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:09:54 -0000
Hi folks, We are still missing IPR replies from Ali, Bin Wen, and Edward Leyton to close the WGLC. Authors, Please also start to address the comments that have been raised by Anoop. Thanks, From: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> Sent: lundi 31 mai 2021 09:31 To: 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org> Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org Subject: WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02 Hello WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02 [1]. This poll runs until * the 7th of June *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. There is currently no IPR disclosed. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. Thank you, Stephane & Matthew [1] <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa/ [2] <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
- [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Samir Thoria (sthoria)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Wen, Bin
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Dikshit, Saumya
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Dikshit, Saumya
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Dikshit, Saumya
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… slitkows.ietf
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on d… Dikshit, Saumya