IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02

Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 01 June 2021 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005473A273E; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myzAFuAvXbDm; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750003A2737; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id h9so688366oih.4; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 13:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=K1EYKOFju74J+RG4Z7kGHF4zBpWmKqACcF0UsPdy6oY=; b=FHttcVmW+0NEgcyYSwjC+s3hh5pRSipz+k0ZHrtqw11FJkPNu25Rje/n48y7+Qezl7 hQgGqvhkD2aCHyve1yLFB41mJroyCns5KacXUPL77T2xSwLkTCIlofC1B+sn1YP+tMeG Nn1ZcT7kLWYdEnV+pOZUWBT1CahsBuJDPkkyNaKDwqNAKOxHA/Xc51lIo08DRjdV6oEN zCpAKoQX2d26yRIHNk+CEGMsxiuolxGXHJHg6ZjLyMOFSck4YZCj3rZTk3vME5H0WdaA Zto18pn7k+rtWJLNY89h0PFZ7dbrud33LaBxRVqf2N4w5xKTGkes/q76z7QDT5bREm18 g56Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=K1EYKOFju74J+RG4Z7kGHF4zBpWmKqACcF0UsPdy6oY=; b=PIhJREZczQJYdvphFxX8yib8S9GJOZKEa5AIEQJW1Cr2L9rgYzbJbx6wRCaw8ZhZym bCkBMnZP8m3y0DBOpK59iPT0Obogokxq70Jh+fHMsO8+3Ftp3as9kKKmPu7i6RQeNDIa DWKybHAu6rcA/lzvHwb3WTIrmVEm9eCM6E/bXddn0aOcZ2Tvv+/aLR7dZwHixvtbPfIS i3IplUPDgHE2VSVMpbPD2ToPrEy3QWT4WEF5RRN3YMpt3m7ieM9gKXUoRxpCDVotuwuK lEsC9w8QnsFudmrmjoSEF7vozdXsamkhCqPfh0fZ8UPE260Aub/EnJltprB+XHXcSp/w 22qA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rrSCBi1XxUXmz0mZkKnegx6hhE6ILBtWnNbAKfPEwn3HDCFzV /nlMdu+mz/htRvvKXueBUzs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvKGhrH6uk+/2kSl5zVlui4NhVXznSRwXZGd6uxSmph3aNKE8uTk63E6CjeFuHuPH1RAXdsQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:7c1:: with SMTP id f1mr18959425oij.142.1622581157517; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 13:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DF4PR8401MB0650.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([2a01:111:f400:7509::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm559022oto.40.2021.06.01.13.58.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Jun 2021 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>, 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org>
CC: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02
Thread-Index: AddV7uUJiQ2tX+9USFeBi1lnYcR0KQ==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 20:55:24 +0000
Message-ID: <DF4PR8401MB06502DAD8232AA93E2E0C05AAF3E9@DF4PR8401MB0650.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <0aad01d755ee$ed599f10$c80cdd30$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF4PR8401MB06502DAD8232AA93E2E0C05AAF3E9DF4PR8401MB0650_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/gVQ5S8rahcwajt_HcwBrOEXB5V8>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 20:59:24 -0000

As co-author, I support publication.
Not aware of any IPR and an implementation exists on Cisco IOS-XR (several releases)

Regards,
Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  laburdet.ietf@gmail.com  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814

From: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, May 31, 2021 at 03:31
To: 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02


Hello WG,







This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on

draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02 [1].







This poll runs until * the 7th of June *.







We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to

this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF

IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please

respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any

relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from

all the Authors and Contributors.



There is currently no IPR disclosed.







If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly

respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in

conformance with IETF rules.







We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].







Thank you,



Stephane & Matthew







[1]

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa/



[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email