Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <> Tue, 14 February 2017 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910F129699 for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:46:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psv07Fhcqb6T for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8CA129731 for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:46:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1965; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487097998; x=1488307598; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=GlHyTorLZ1GWYfKvZjCofD9f9yEDEIgaQHnZB3bYpf4=; b=UxEyAnIV7tazoHtBzVhqQzcegG7VVg+ILu/kbbXKMpvL4v4u5GDoBRvb gedk6zujMXIsTw8RTty8MM+xkRXZ/NzUb6LhdoTXxZ4qEuKQeWdjkOZ5B UPa850ouPeCqehDmqdDL0qMO4jLGcIlidCX7oiSot6P9zQMliCsAOs1ui 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,162,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="385562371"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2017 18:46:37 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1EIkbj5014503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:37 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:46:36 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:46:36 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <>
To: Martin Vigoureux <>, BESS <>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03
Thread-Index: AQHShvKr4pF3namPIUWQxeAH1l/JEg==
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:36 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:46:47 -0000

Support as co-auhtor. Not aware of any non-disclosed IPR.


On 2/13/17, 2:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
< on behalf of> wrote:

>Hello Working Group,
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 [1] which is considered
>mature and ready for a final working group review.
>Note that this call is longer than usual because we are pushing two
>correlated documents together.
>Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
>version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
>*5th of March*.
>Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is
>also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed
>Standard RFC.
>*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
>applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding, to ensure that
>IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979,
>4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>*If* you are listed as a document author or contributor of
>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 please respond to this
>email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document
>or its earlier versions.
>We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of
>what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2].
>Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs.
>Thank you,
>BESS mailing list