Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage

"Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834791200B9 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRwH7QSEnWEX for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B0B12951C for <bess@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=3M7yIuu1X2WvCyeDZ6DyG/o9AjpScmimKDLs1gH5Stc=; b=LIGoJzqvf4JkllRbNFtRE8LAFwr73d5x05uuPOdif20QVMnpulakkPi6Xw6YWWUvnDpHSqZ1LVfihsBoRcslWwbm+p4nhK53RRjfickj/4ypbOaQPEy7MpjFqT1kw0gnRM7m0UqmV0M6JYq24fDIlEbX7x600WnzVBHpO3Ka0c8=
Received: from DB5PR07MB0981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.161.200.151) by DB5PR07MB1031.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.161.200.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1157.9; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 21:11:34 +0000
Received: from DB5PR07MB0981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89d4:79e9:a24a:df19]) by DB5PR07MB0981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89d4:79e9:a24a:df19%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1157.012; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 21:11:33 +0000
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
To: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Nozay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage
Thread-Index: AQHS3s7Qh86RUpGBJkiFuqMsapWl0qIX3/mA
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:11:33 +0000
Message-ID: <79DFBB56-6737-4366-BBED-F2C36D339614@nokia.com>
References: <b41bd33c-cbd9-cbc6-a2b5-614da7ae1115@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <b41bd33c-cbd9-cbc6-a2b5-614da7ae1115@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.23.0.170603
authentication-results: nokia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nokia.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [135.245.20.7]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5PR07MB1031; 7:aqhCZykpy9RBYIrPYHPw+SeaanL4xzXqYiH2OfkvyTw0kCxDVms5sLSEoFrusxR4roGfTTrCyzoz0XaYZc7HMAXm4cVZk2zZxvWv5sFArgcsnamTidKVJrfCr22M7vSXJS/QnWPSKKIdAZo169pLbkNyU5WwCDGv7ThYPTFpWHQnbwaPTHwHoWh+PUt9o4P5VSKbU5b5uVCgUxjYxeZnXR5z8Y+ZsPiTkundgRLG9WCKA8/mZCvt7GWZl62/A7jyBzbEpa3xoOtnhganHmSH9RAcv0kAHhzc10TMfekoCqTfm3m3SOaguPtOk72nfoi8pwy2z3Juleh+pQihxA2SLQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39400400002)(39860400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(24454002)(377454003)(966005)(25786009)(33656002)(50986999)(54356999)(189998001)(76176999)(230783001)(2950100002)(53546009)(4001350100001)(66066001)(5660300001)(2900100001)(14454004)(2906002)(3280700002)(6506006)(3660700001)(6486002)(6246003)(6306002)(6512007)(99286003)(53936002)(6436002)(3846002)(478600001)(7736002)(81166006)(6116002)(102836003)(8676002)(305945005)(229853002)(5250100002)(8936002)(83716003)(36756003)(82746002)(83506001)(86362001)(38730400002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5PR07MB1031; H:DB5PR07MB0981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB5PR07MB1031:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1d8ea76c-52f6-481c-da29-08d4ad209c44
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:DB5PR07MB1031;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB5PR07MB1031E5B5D69DA579694D3862F7CB0@DB5PR07MB1031.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(82608151540597);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:DB5PR07MB1031; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:DB5PR07MB1031;
x-forefront-prvs: 033054F29A
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DFF897E2D278BA468C5AC50C6D7E3305@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jun 2017 21:11:33.6868 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR07MB1031
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/yKrMFj4uI9LiwtMFhlqpspYk6nE>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:11:39 -0000

I fully support this document for RFC publication. 
As a co-author, I’m not aware of any related IPR.

Thanks.
Jorge


On 6/6/17, 7:11 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" <bess-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> wrote:

    Hello Working Group,
    
    This email starts a Working Group Last Call on 
    draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready 
    for a final working group review.
    
    Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
    version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
    *20th of June*.
    Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is 
    also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as an 
    Informational RFC.
    
    *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that 
    applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage, to ensure that IPR has been 
    disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 
    and 5378 for more details).
    
    If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of
    draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 please respond to this email and indicate 
    whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
    
    Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document 
    or its earlier versions.
    
    As opposed to the policy [2], we are not polling for knowledge of 
    implementations as it does not seem to make sense in that case. If you 
    feel otherwise, please let us know.
    
    Thank you,
    M&T
    
    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage/
    [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
    
    _______________________________________________
    BESS mailing list
    BESS@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess