IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] AD Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-24: role issue - The pull request

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 20 September 2018 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CF2130E79 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 02:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2Q3ukzGIbEY for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 02:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC5C1130E76 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 02:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1537435528; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=04kCazZA+8oKXJKBq19+0BglHpUUvRxDNLAzWs9L2Bg=; b=E6/x7Db8e4AJ3MGjSzQARskw5/M/6n1OyZYyxLQFl25yp5Z22cEKGt0CuE+RXa+K 8pOeuNlIautsYPuOSTLRdIRohoYKVhjMwWfzRGwq+iHApseXD+kJl69V0DwxIUc8 PnOfApptOa3izeur0xO3bkDo5mE2TIjTaCimyhA9i1M=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-37dff70000003197-2a-5ba36788f67b
Received: from ESESSMB502.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.120]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D6.72.12695.88763AB5; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:25:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESBMB503.ericsson.se (153.88.183.170) by ESESSMB502.ericsson.se (153.88.183.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:25:28 +0200
Received: from ESESBMB503.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.186]) by ESESBMB503.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.186]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.003; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:25:28 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>
CC: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] AD Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-24: role issue - The pull request
Thread-Index: AdRLeDAXQdw2ACGbThquOLmME3BJeQErzWQAAAaj0IAAIudLgA==
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:25:28 +0000
Message-ID: <DFD1905D-2E84-4760-81EA-FD2A8D260995@ericsson.com>
References: <24eb743e07ff4af087ab36f1c4fe050e@ericsson.com> <96BA408A-8034-4558-BFEA-2FD2A2FE506C@gmail.com> <e54f48b925af41e28cb4f290af9b64ae@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <e54f48b925af41e28cb4f290af9b64ae@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.0.180812
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.157]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C2AEF68C02485A46BDBB4FD817118DE4@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7hW5H+uJog9aNxhYrz61gtvi37iiT A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUxq3sNe8EZkYovPxuYGhg7RLoYOTkkBEwk 7l5cwdrFyMUhJHCUUeLQymNMIAkhgW+MEne3GUIkljFKNC66wd7FyMHBJmAh0f1PG8QUEVCW WD6LFaScWUBT4urhXYwgtrBAqsT1pUvYQGwRgTSJH+vboGwniQeTfrCD2CwCqhJvO36D1fMK 2Ev8Xz6dHWLVAkaJyU2TwIZyCthIfNq5FKyBUUBM4vupNUwQy8Qlbj2ZzwTxgIDEkj3nmSFs UYmXj/+xgtwmKqAvMe1yAERYSWJL7xYmkDDInet36UNMsZbY+GgjM4StKDGl+yE7xDmCEidn PmGZwCgxC8myWQjds5B0z0LSPQtJ9wJG1lWMosWpxcW56UZGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgRF4 cMtvqx2MB587HmIU4GBU4uE1910cLcSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmE938iUIg3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1 +BCjNAeLkjivU5pFlJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoHR8G6jnbT0vKxG9fhPbi+kZxpvcz0w STRbgj8nM8iprjbhQcHSqyJxO398rFnz1SnMxSFG/YB0vdtP+cS7BmvTdz0MnfxxVcDjH0Wp SubVl9fzuzQdim0ykVa9lPF3V9TlOw0pqi+7rEwP+uXN9lxXvHDzmTQG0SC1VRtv7t+4e+XO o5cPCu1WYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAWiSOPrwCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/tltdIkdUU_F3Sb6oaAnSNc2co90>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] AD Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-24: role issue - The pull request
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:25:34 -0000

Hi,

One clarification:

>1) There is no BFCPv2. We need to talk about “An implementation compliant to this specification”, or something like that.

There may be different versions of the BFCP protocol. However,  the draft does not define the BFCP protocol, but the O/A procedures for establishing a BFCP stream :)

Regards,

Christer

 
From: Alan Ford [mailto:alan.ford@gmail.com] 
Sent: 19 September 2018 19:45
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] AD Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-24: role issue - The pull request
 
Hi Christer, all,
 
I’ve just added some review comments to the PR. One sentence still needs to be removed, and I think we need to be stronger with the clarification of the deprecation, I propose a paragraph along the lines of:
 
In RFC4583, there was a third option specified, "c-s", which meant that an endpoint was willing to act as floor control client and floor control server. This feature was not implemented as specified, and the implementations which did signal "c-s" used it to mean that the endpoint is willing to act as floor control client or floor control server. An implementation of BFCPv2 MUST NOT send "c-s" as a floorctl attribute value, but I 
Regards,
Alan



On 13 Sep 2018, at 16:43, Christer Holmberg <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
 
Hi,

I have created a pull request for the role issue. 

https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-bfcp-4583bis/pull/10

The pull request also updates references but does not address Adam's other issues.

Regards,

Christer

Ps. Note that I do not intend to submit a pull request for 4582bis. If changes are needed, I assume one of the authors will handle that.

_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
 

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email