Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ietf-bier-01-06: (with BLOCK)
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 22:35 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880CE12DA17; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:35:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8HxY5iqeyP2; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:35:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3353E12DA0D; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e10so4927005oiy.8; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:35:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KaFXR1+NTckluQyjjt9fLsevwQkxPpJlWr0+EEvAxmc=; b=b4pVVpJJNAAX3Xt5iKY7U6DJWL2kxpbf6Py4dGHBVwfVK1r7uZ5rrwMDXX0529urOP nIAMd3ZOcijl2tqLlfdihW90cbxSunj9J5kdQ7Crttc6YkiCDpqwCyqvV4PN32MzA0C5 KhEHrY8Wuqm77lF/INuzoXg9QybYysfBgGx3wtag2XmTd8zJIyAnZLjS5S2nl3GwkaH/ 8AUGOfZNb3DEI0qPX/mzM5TvLWDV0uskrO81rjTs8OtImo+kT9KAofoCgnWbB5gHpyC1 ShDSPcRdx0DLeNGaaeQvFkGoukLYUpDM9jxTIsOjZO4OPMGLabF9jUfIvEnG5tmXtApU gG6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KaFXR1+NTckluQyjjt9fLsevwQkxPpJlWr0+EEvAxmc=; b=muPycnxm5WQbxmxlmsk9VC4LA3CTdzSwWUWGA8SOZ0cpg1NLRlZVb+Bf31odeq7Npg oD5vtIExyvXzAxlIFmM0GWP/pWjaY7ZF1APl+9+quIndrDlRygYSirmswqswTvcutfHl XIsEL1ieqvJy0S+ak0GytOoI3xa+WIvXd50dd+A5IrAnXLoecl8qO+U9eSyP5qC9SLzl A0fNHGpQHgrMj/SixWDANcDe39+frJkyW2KwaU+FZlJE4qlVk1pTtGwqgP7EihL5QZyN LlhvGsNKKMuQ+NZfs/tO8RvNstC8LKodefPW34WE7riLVqVEl0ZVHoNRz4EICo4JqyJ4 VzQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB+L8VrubbyK4uHx2HpcMyHF61PQmRORNDL7Ruv4+X1F4hRUsRG AF+fTHiBOUqMlN6vMRZJLPKGDUi4tJzR4orvkXg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226tYMtAzw+x3pdvkiI2OuEHpjS9UN6s7NJDFLTgBU7R9kDoWY8/swqkAX0E9JXH7xhyLiP4KCOZxhodvl6tSLA=
X-Received: by 10.202.0.144 with SMTP id 138mr5510376oia.331.1519338910401; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:35:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.68.57 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:35:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180222215134.GB28992@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <151926171240.21109.8042886067471225222.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAG4d1rcnEJTO5XzyZtjzPianQLuPZGsWs_z_musydUj04HPV-g@mail.gmail.com> <20180222215134.GB28992@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:35:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rcgHpRWSGqMj+zq8qMR4zVLRDLCmiGhsAzXRKws5UDJ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>, bier-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137ab200c49f10565d4a826"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/p57CFGetJZpWppVgjLhSbzR0i3s>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ietf-bier-01-06: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:35:22 -0000
Hi Toerless, TEAS can also do OSPF/ISIS signaling work for TE, just like BIER can for BIER. We can revisit if necessary - but this seems like the cleanest split at this time. Regards, Alia On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > Thanks, Alia, Deborah: > > Yes, BIER-TE is about the explicit traffic steering in the forwarding > plane, > Using TE in the name was just the easiest marketing name to make > readers understand it, even if some other variation of the name > might have been more precise. > > Wrt to the proposed "No control-plane work will be done in BIER-WG" > > What is the logic of selecting a working group for e.g.: IGP extensions > that we may want to have for BIER-TE ? I see ISIS/OSPF extensions for > BIER which have been done in BIER, not in those IGPs WGs (or LSR upcoming). > > I had already reached out to PCE WG to explain BIER-TE, will > also reach out to TEAS, so definitely interested to figure out what > the best WG for each part of the solution. I am only worried that > the charter statement would preclude decisions e.g.: in TEAS like > "this part of signaling, please do it in BIER WG". > > Just paranoid we're not going to be out of options if TEAS > decides something like that. > > Cheers > Toerless > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:54:22PM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Hi Deborah, > > > > How about instead of: > > > > OLD > > 8) BIER Traffic Engineering: Definition of an architecture, and > > specification of the associated technology, for a BIER-based > > mechanism to support traffic engineering." > > > > NEW > > 9) Forwarding Plane Mechanisms for BIER Traffic Engineering: > definition of > > how the new BIER forwarding plane structures (e.g. BIFT) can be > used > > to > > support engineered multicast trees. No control-plane work will be > > done in BIER-WG. > > > > and the WGs to coordinate with will have added: > > > > * teas on control-plane mechnisms to use BIER-TE forwarding mechanisms. > > > > Regards, > > Alia > > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com> > wrote: > > > > > Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for > > > charter-ietf-bier-01-06: Block > > > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bier/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > BLOCK: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > While a Discuss, this should be simple to address as I think it's a > bit of > > > a misnomer > > > which Alvaro has already noted. > > > About: > > > "8) BIER Traffic Engineering: Definition of an architecture, and > > > specification of the associated technology, for a BIER-based > > > mechanism to support traffic engineering." > > > > > > Looking at the wg draft (which it seems this new charter item is based > on), > > > the draft says: > > > "It does support traffic engineering by explicit hop-by-hop forwarding" > > > and "it is more similar to SR than RSVP-TE". > > > > > > So it is not TE, it is explicit forwarding. As Alvaro noted, this > should > > > not > > > be identified in the charter as TE. I don't see any need for this new > item > > > to > > > be in the charter (as Alvaro noted). > > > > > > This is a Discuss because if this is not a simple misnomer, then this > work > > > clashes with TEAS. TEAS is chartered and responsible for > > > "Traffic-engineering > > > architectures for generic applicability across packet and non-packet > > > networks. > > > This includes both networks that include the use of PCE and those that > do > > > not." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > BIER mailing list > > > BIER@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier > > > > > -- > --- > tte@cs.fau.de >
- [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ietf-b… Deborah Brungard
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Antoni Przygienda
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Xiejingrong
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… IJsbrand Wijnands
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Bier] Deborah Brungard's Block on charter-ie… Lou Berger