IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bimi] [rfc-i] SVG P/S Feedback

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 31 August 2020 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567833A1795 for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Y2pCcFLm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nv5N1ujE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRxqa9-H9AcU for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ABC3A178D for <bimi@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9802 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2020 16:18:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2646.5f4d22d7.k2008; bh=AjTHVY2vw5fWAhfflRneODLS4PLqGbbWy5k5DJU4sN0=; b=Y2pCcFLmclGYgYjnswIiupRueeX6ZKJIZySUCCpNVYEhAbZn8NdMnLlpNla/TJ0JGnRlkmCkpGaBgC5N0L7nw44efyzOWdKYj62utuJL4XdD9LmOxnucdrZrF8/RA1F/ukVhye3+O4sGfIYlqOI4Uwa4AxpTzdJ/JZzXmhTlBtUV8X37xyGxyR5wmLqpc8lrt3nADHDvhX9xVzvyNZM/IzTTnDtKO6n5L0tN6KSRRg93KhOum9dcendxTgYkFbr76X99Std/HA+aj6wXFFWTU/EjFjFvZVn/1BMo+rHABHelvqILzW9ZaYc4XLQIeHrovDcmBFSbLpAvtEXhCYTP8Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2646.5f4d22d7.k2008; bh=AjTHVY2vw5fWAhfflRneODLS4PLqGbbWy5k5DJU4sN0=; b=nv5N1ujEB6AMidjD8QcawzSU8YBs6IePgLpgSOTSg9ES1wBmmn8O4/pQ5GWh576F0fUx+uibaB5UXEtWAqCCPBXxfy0FdcQfO5eBFvKgjOzzKnG3uqWg5I22Z+DaDMhbvHtBd5AlV7hwmTYf9gwQ9wl/WXZOK4yHRZhHVe1ombzg/U6KY2TdHaR4hbBiHUkHfqHnBlhZf4Nb98+mwz4QmPjzHMrnRdy3udHTbu7LNcxLC+A6/gyaOwdD7DUtITySfrjFSUKM6SwJuagqe6Zkh2jzT92QR18vLTBKorx+B6oNVct1fDTpZiaYX6ERmB0QlREQ8LpXU2T9QmfwrncYZg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Aug 2020 16:18:31 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id D83341F51117; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:18:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:18:30 -0400
Message-Id: <20200831161830.D83341F51117@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: bimi@ietf.org
Cc: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <70eadfe5-16f6-47d9-4cb8-f4f9bffdd355@gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/v1FtZuSlRSovwRVD-zwF6A84v28>
Subject: Re: [Bimi] [rfc-i] SVG P/S Feedback
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:18:34 -0000

In article <70eadfe5-16f6-47d9-4cb8-f4f9bffdd355@gmail.com> you write:
>Alex,
>
>I have to say that the RFC7996 profile of SVG Tiny is, in my experience, a problem rather than a solution. It was
>designed with the best possible intentions and some of the rules (like no colour, no greyscale, and no external
>references) are appropriate for the RFC context, but trying to generate conformant SVG with popular and widespread
>drawing tools is almost impossible**.

I agree that 7996 has problems. We have not yet published an RFC with
SVG pictures and I expect that when we do, we'll have to revise it.

In any case, that profile is designed for documents, and there's no
reason to assume it would be appropriate for logos displayed next to
your junk mail.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email