IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)

Michael Procter <michael@voip.co.uk> Mon, 27 April 2009 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@voip.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268833A68B9 for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AX2ARifwtor8 for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.77]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D3813A6B3B for <bliss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([209.85.220.164]) by na3sys009aob106.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSfXnOFncaebDAcRSGBaV/FAh1UD98lB9@postini.com; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:11:21 PDT
Received: by mail-fx0-f164.google.com with SMTP id 8so42162fxm.18 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.119.19 with SMTP id w19mr3369383mum.80.1240852280773; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <719F9BBB3E7E71428A2D13F3D76C768F01A1EF33@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
References: <F592E36A5C943E4E91F25880D05AD1140937CB3E@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <a2ef85430904240846k3a301efk4302165a3d9eded1@mail.gmail.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1DA436E8@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <a2ef85430904242329p1baf3fa4o7e366d9a3f7a928c@mail.gmail.com> <719F9BBB3E7E71428A2D13F3D76C768F01A1EF33@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:11:20 +0100
Message-ID: <a2ef85430904271011m17fedc62n23f4487790aed62@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Procter <michael@voip.co.uk>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bliss@ietf.org, Scott Orton <orton@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:10:01 -0000

2009/4/27 Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I think the auto-retrieve timer is really something that would be
> implemented in the park server and the phone does not need to know
> anything about it.

Yes, that was my thought.

> What might be useful from the parking UA's perspective is that when the
> call is auto-retrieved (i.e. the park server refer's the call back to
> the parking UA or possibly a different UA) that the resulting INVITE
> contains an indication that the INVITE is a result of the auto-retrieve
> initiated by the park server. Could we say something about this in the
> draft?

Surely this is something that could be addressed with History-Info?

Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email