IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)

"Francois Audet" <audet@nortel.com> Mon, 27 April 2009 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <AUDET@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1088528C158 for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.224, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qIwNvrD3-PM for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61033A6FDE for <bliss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com (zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com [47.103.123.71]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n3RHaXB12277; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:33 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:36:32 -0500
Message-ID: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1DAA2BE6@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <a2ef85430904271011m17fedc62n23f4487790aed62@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)
Thread-Index: AcnHWzMHxQzTDTgBQZKVEJCATW696AAA2fnw
References: <F592E36A5C943E4E91F25880D05AD1140937CB3E@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <a2ef85430904240846k3a301efk4302165a3d9eded1@mail.gmail.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1DA436E8@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <a2ef85430904242329p1baf3fa4o7e366d9a3f7a928c@mail.gmail.com> <719F9BBB3E7E71428A2D13F3D76C768F01A1EF33@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> <a2ef85430904271011m17fedc62n23f4487790aed62@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>
To: Michael Procter <michael@voip.co.uk>, "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
Cc: bliss@ietf.org, Scott Orton <orton@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:35:21 -0000

Actually, I don't think it would be History-Info: I think it would
be Referred-by header (RFC 3892). It would just say it's the
Park Server. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Procter [mailto:michael@voip.co.uk] 
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:11
> To: Hutton, Andrew
> Cc: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); bliss@ietf.org; Orton, 
> Scott (RICH1:B620)
> Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments on 
> draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal)
> 
> 2009/4/27 Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the auto-retrieve timer is really something that would be 
> > implemented in the park server and the phone does not need to know 
> > anything about it.
> 
> Yes, that was my thought.
> 
> > What might be useful from the parking UA's perspective is that when 
> > the call is auto-retrieved (i.e. the park server refer's 
> the call back 
> > to the parking UA or possibly a different UA) that the resulting 
> > INVITE contains an indication that the INVITE is a result of the 
> > auto-retrieve initiated by the park server. Could we say something 
> > about this in the draft?
> 
> Surely this is something that could be addressed with History-Info?
> 
> Michael
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email