IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bmwg] draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful

Edwin Cordeiro <edwin@scordeiro.net> Mon, 24 May 2021 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <edwin@scordeiro.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D273A2560 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.107, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7vS4tSdUVXg for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa12-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa12-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA6C3A24AE for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com ([209.85.219.171]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id l988l0TX7SYqal988l1KvW; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:52:20 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=WqbujfTv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60ab9374 a=d18h0WWFc7Z6YE66qzsnZA==:117 a=8xMvceQ19CgA:10 a=5FLXtPjwQuUA:10 a=032167dsd2IeU8N2o0sA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=SHCseH0UiqWuufo4-x0A:9 a=s38khR5F-inMg29G:21 a=Z5ABNNGmrOfJ6cZ5bIyy:22 a=UDnyf2zBuKT2w-IlGP_r:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: edwin@scordeiro.net
Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id f9so37704874ybo.6; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530r4eM96FDoIH/Tcravc3WWFaOC3M5fE7WtyfP5DlKfdjdLZvoW 6X+lATFCOqhgTCUR3Ubb6FZqlAzfBBVtCpq3fwo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKXB9ybAcZBo1gZJKdcrU4j3XCB+g6mc7NBmMHJCERw94WqKyDAnfmyOu7ASd0Uy+fC+FkmmkxCnxla5SYTYA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:f504:: with SMTP id a4mr33789927ybe.503.1621857140282; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Edwin Cordeiro <edwin@scordeiro.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:51:44 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAERpkxBMxSsMZhSPHrRAptZkxyFPmMZfj=O29aSzC-Op9Kb5QA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAERpkxBMxSsMZhSPHrRAptZkxyFPmMZfj=O29aSzC-Op9Kb5QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b91bcd05c3120a79"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDE/OS8H4HS29Y4nbxJVS8jjnizr8/+1lBqzpHOn1oWvD6HGDhOuG7TNOscDwOkbfVmnX0THxzs5K9FQMESFPMvrAOv1MMWV4Hh/Kg0oW3aIuxu09Dtt 98W6xfMQJRq2+4/8q7xSFJt6tkNdt03/2yKZv1gyyN37Mt2WqU27vT548ld7EnwG+TJjbGeskx0ZUWoPTmt9rKuMCz13M765TmaTDDJvW7c79nwSwD8h0Zh1 hDd/FFSI/Lue/poj34vfl2sz2Xj4Du2XHCKy29rDmfg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/-O1mPgk3Bp2V4dl2ADg90Yhtq4M>
Subject: [bmwg] draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 11:52:25 -0000

Dear authors of draft-lencse-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful,

I agree with the motivation and ideas of the draft and I support its
adoption.

I recommend that the TCP considerations for such benchmarking methodology
should not be left for a future document, as TCP still is the most used
protocol. So, the details on TCP difficulties and an extension of this
benchmark to consider TCP, should be in the scope of this document.

Best regards,

Edwin Cordeiro

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email