[bmwg] 2nd Tentataive Agenda for the BMWG at the 56th IETF.

Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net> Mon, 10 March 2003 14:46 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA26644 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:46:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2AExXO16409; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:59:33 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2AEwHO16354 for <bmwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:58:17 -0500
Received: from merlot.juniper.net (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA26574; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:44:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from juniper.net (ssh.juniper.net [207.17.136.39]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h2AEkoS64961; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 06:46:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdubray@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <3E6CA55A.4000807@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:46:50 -0500
From: Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 (CK-SillyDog)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [bmwg] 2nd Tentataive Agenda for the BMWG at the 56th IETF.
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg)

MONDAY, March 17, 2003, 1530-1730
=======================================

CHAIRS: Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net>
         Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>

AGENDA:

1. [Tentative] Discussion on OSPF Convergence Benchmarking WG Last
    Call comments. Last call is over, but consensus on
    outstanding issues isn't clear.  Identification of outstanding
    issues.  (R. White et al.)

    BMWG mail archive:
    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/bmwg/current/


2. [Tentative] "Considerations in Benchmarking Routing Protocol
    Network Convergence." Is the BMWG the right home for this I-D?
    (R. White)

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt


3. IPsec Device Benchmarking Terminology I-D. Introduction and
    current issues. (M. Bustos)
     http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-term-00.txt


4. Benchmarking Network-layer Traffic Control Mechanisms
    Attempt.  Communicate latest changes & test progress of
    current WG Last Call. (J. Perser et al.)

    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-dsmterm-05.txt


5. Terminology for Benchmark Core Router Software Accelerated
    Life Testing.  Version 00 of this draft seemed to present
    more functional testing than benchmarks - I-D fit to BMWG was
    questioned.  This draft presumes better WG fit; did the principals
    succeed? (S. Poretsky).

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-routersalt-term-01.txt


6. IGP Data plane convergence benchmark I-Ds. Regarding "convergence"
    benchmarking, the WG had restricted scoping of initial
    convergence benchmarks to the control plane.  However, I-Ds below
    were offered as a replacement to the OSPF convergence I-Ds. Should
    they replace the OSPF convergence IDs?  If not, is it time for
    the BMWG to consider explicit data plane convergence?  If yes,
    what is the IGP drafts' relationship to the OSPF convergence
    I-Ds? Replacement on companion? (K. Dubray)

    See BMWG mail archive of OSPF convergence benchmark I-Ds'
    Last Call.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-term-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-meth-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-app-00.txt 



Please help contribute to a successful meeting by reading the above
I-D(s) and references before the meeting.

To offer comments on BMWG work in progress or the agenda itself,
please send email to:

           bmwg@ietf.org

Alternatively, to offer potential agenda items, please email:

           kdubray@juniper.net and acmorton@att.com
















_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg



_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg