Re: [bmwg] 2nd Tentative Agenda for the BMWG at the 56th IETF.

[Al Morton <[e-mail]>]

Scott,
I _strongly_ believe your drafts are already there.
Please see the agenda at end of your message...
Al

At 10:42 AM 03/10/2003 -0500, Scott Poretsky wrote:

Kevin,
...
I still _strongly_ believe that the terminology and methodology drafts that I wrote for Data Plane Measurements to Benchmark IGP Convergence should be on this agenda as well.  ...
See
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-term-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-term-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-meth-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-meth-00.txt
for Data Plane Measurements to Benchmark IGP Convergence.

Thanks,
Scott

At 09:46 AM 3/10/03 -0500, Kevin Dubray wrote:

Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg)

MONDAY, March 17, 2003, 1530-1730
=======================================

CHAIRS: Kevin Dubray <[e-mail]>
        Al Morton <[e-mail]>

AGENDA:

1. [Tentative] Discussion on OSPF Convergence Benchmarking WG Last
   Call comments. Last call is over, but consensus on
   outstanding issues isn't clear.  Identification of outstanding
   issues.  (R. White et al.)

   BMWG mail archive:
   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/bmwg/current/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/bmwg/current/


2. [Tentative] "Considerations in Benchmarking Routing Protocol
   Network Convergence." Is the BMWG the right home for this I-D?
   (R. White)

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt


3. IPsec Device Benchmarking Terminology I-D. Introduction and
   current issues. (M. Bustos)
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-term-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-term-00.txt


4. Benchmarking Network-layer Traffic Control Mechanisms
   Attempt.  Communicate latest changes & test progress of
   current WG Last Call. (J. Perser et al.)

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-dsmterm-05.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-dsmterm-05.txt


5. Terminology for Benchmark Core Router Software Accelerated
   Life Testing.  Version 00 of this draft seemed to present
   more functional testing than benchmarks - I-D fit to BMWG was
   questioned.  This draft presumes better WG fit; did the principals
   succeed? (S. Poretsky).

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-routersalt-term-01.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-routersalt-term-01.txt


6. IGP Data plane convergence benchmark I-Ds. Regarding "convergence"
   benchmarking, the WG had restricted scoping of initial
   convergence benchmarks to the control plane.  However, I-Ds below
   were offered as a replacement to the OSPF convergence I-Ds. Should
   they replace the OSPF convergence IDs?  If not, is it time for
   the BMWG to consider explicit data plane convergence?  If yes,
   what is the IGP drafts' relationship to the OSPF convergence
   I-Ds? Replacement on companion? (K. Dubray)

   See BMWG mail archive of OSPF convergence benchmark I-Ds'
   Last Call.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-term-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-term-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-meth-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-meth-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-app-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-igp-convergence-app-00.txt


Please help contribute to a successful meeting by reading the above
I-D(s) and references before the meeting.

To offer comments on BMWG work in progress or the agenda itself,
please send email to:

          [e-mail]

Alternatively, to offer potential agenda items, please email:

          [e-mail] and [e-mail]
















_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg" rel="nofollow">https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg



_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg" rel="nofollow">https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg